2019 Power Player—Sharon Dietrich
In 2018, Sharon Dietrich and her team at Community Legal Services of Philadelphia helped to implement “My Clean Slate,” which went into effect on Dec. 26.
June 15, 2019 at 11:27 AM
4 minute read
By The Legal Intelligencer
Sharon Dietrich, Community Legal Services of Philadelphia
In 2018, Dietrich and her team at Community Legal Services of Philadelphia helped to implement “My Clean Slate,” which went into effect on Dec. 26.
Nonviolent first-degree misdemeanors and most simple assault convictions became eligible for sealing, if the individual had not been convicted for 10 years and if no fines and costs are owed.
Clean Slate was passed with a near unanimous vote (188-2) and signed into law by Gov. Tom Wolf. The law expands criminal record sealing to include more types of offenses, including some first-degree misdemeanors, which can be sealed by filing petitions. The law also creates an automated computer process to seal arrests that did not result in convictions within 60 days, summary convictions after 10 years, and some second and third-degree misdemeanor convictions if there are no subsequent misdemeanor or felony convictions for a period of 10 years after the time of conviction. The automatic sealing provision will go into effect on June 28.
How did you first become interested in the issue of criminal records and the barriers they create?
I remember the first time in the late 1980s that I met a person who asked me for legal advice because he was unemployed based on his criminal record. I thought that it was an interesting issue (which at that time had no visibility whatsoever), and that it probably applied to many others. With developments like criminal record databases, the rise of the background screening industry, and 9/11, the barrier posed by criminal records has become the single most significant one faced by low-income and minority workers. Two-thirds of the employment intake of Community Legal Services is from people seeking relief from their criminal records, typically old or minor cases that should not affect their employment. We work on this issue because it is the one on which our clients most need our help.
Criminal justice reform is often a contentious and divisive political topic. What do you think it was about the “Clean Slate” bill specifically that allowed it to win bipartisan support at a time when that is increasingly rare?
Criminal justice reform is no longer contentious and divisive; the Left and the Right now have a great deal of agreement that it is necessary. This is not only in Pennsylvania, but also on the federal level (where Congress just passed the First Step Act last year) and across the states. Expungement and sealing also are very popular, with the majority of states expanding eligibility. Common thinking is that our criminal justice system had devolved to a position where it has devalued human potential, cost a great deal of money and has not been supported by social science or common sense. In addition to being supported by these viewpoints, the Clean Slate bill was a solution to the reality that fewer than one out of 10 people eligible to clear their records actually achieve that result. Clean Slate was a sensible policy reform that could be embraced by everyone. And it was, here in Pennsylvania. We are the first, but certainly not the last, state to adopt this measure.
What is the best advice you ever received?
Back in 1987, I had accepted an offer at a law firm, to begin after my clerkship ended. Before I started, I got an offer from Community Legal Services. I was mortified at the prospect of reneging on the firm's offer. Friends told me that the firm would be mad, but they would hire someone else and get over it, and I could make a big difference at CLS. Thirty-two years later, I couldn't be happier that I took that advice. My career at CLS has allowed me to practice law in the public service and to have great satisfaction in what I do every day.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
De-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 2
Trending Stories
- 1Which Legal Tech Jobs Are on the Rise, and Which Aren't, with Jared Coseglia
- 2Absent Explicit Agreement, Court Rejects Unilateral Responsiveness Redaction of Text Messages
- 3SEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration
- 4Sidley Hires Paul Hastings Energy Finance Partner in Houston
- 5Potential Pitfalls in Arbitrating Religious Disputes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250