2019 Power Player—Sharon Dietrich
In 2018, Sharon Dietrich and her team at Community Legal Services of Philadelphia helped to implement “My Clean Slate,” which went into effect on Dec. 26.
June 15, 2019 at 11:27 AM
4 minute read
By The Legal Intelligencer
Sharon Dietrich, Community Legal Services of Philadelphia
In 2018, Dietrich and her team at Community Legal Services of Philadelphia helped to implement “My Clean Slate,” which went into effect on Dec. 26.
Nonviolent first-degree misdemeanors and most simple assault convictions became eligible for sealing, if the individual had not been convicted for 10 years and if no fines and costs are owed.
Clean Slate was passed with a near unanimous vote (188-2) and signed into law by Gov. Tom Wolf. The law expands criminal record sealing to include more types of offenses, including some first-degree misdemeanors, which can be sealed by filing petitions. The law also creates an automated computer process to seal arrests that did not result in convictions within 60 days, summary convictions after 10 years, and some second and third-degree misdemeanor convictions if there are no subsequent misdemeanor or felony convictions for a period of 10 years after the time of conviction. The automatic sealing provision will go into effect on June 28.
How did you first become interested in the issue of criminal records and the barriers they create?
I remember the first time in the late 1980s that I met a person who asked me for legal advice because he was unemployed based on his criminal record. I thought that it was an interesting issue (which at that time had no visibility whatsoever), and that it probably applied to many others. With developments like criminal record databases, the rise of the background screening industry, and 9/11, the barrier posed by criminal records has become the single most significant one faced by low-income and minority workers. Two-thirds of the employment intake of Community Legal Services is from people seeking relief from their criminal records, typically old or minor cases that should not affect their employment. We work on this issue because it is the one on which our clients most need our help.
Criminal justice reform is often a contentious and divisive political topic. What do you think it was about the “Clean Slate” bill specifically that allowed it to win bipartisan support at a time when that is increasingly rare?
Criminal justice reform is no longer contentious and divisive; the Left and the Right now have a great deal of agreement that it is necessary. This is not only in Pennsylvania, but also on the federal level (where Congress just passed the First Step Act last year) and across the states. Expungement and sealing also are very popular, with the majority of states expanding eligibility. Common thinking is that our criminal justice system had devolved to a position where it has devalued human potential, cost a great deal of money and has not been supported by social science or common sense. In addition to being supported by these viewpoints, the Clean Slate bill was a solution to the reality that fewer than one out of 10 people eligible to clear their records actually achieve that result. Clean Slate was a sensible policy reform that could be embraced by everyone. And it was, here in Pennsylvania. We are the first, but certainly not the last, state to adopt this measure.
What is the best advice you ever received?
Back in 1987, I had accepted an offer at a law firm, to begin after my clerkship ended. Before I started, I got an offer from Community Legal Services. I was mortified at the prospect of reneging on the firm's offer. Friends told me that the firm would be mad, but they would hire someone else and get over it, and I could make a big difference at CLS. Thirty-two years later, I couldn't be happier that I took that advice. My career at CLS has allowed me to practice law in the public service and to have great satisfaction in what I do every day.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhiladelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
3 minute readPhila. Attorney Hit With 5-Year Suspension for Mismanaging Firm and Mishandling Cases
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250