2019 Lifetime Achievement Winner—Gregg Rosen
Gregg Rosen began his career by starting an environmental law and natural resources law firm with one of the first environmental lawyers (then known as environmental strike force lawyers) of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources.
June 16, 2019 at 02:40 PM
3 minute read
Gregg Rosen, McGuireWoods
Rosen began his career by starting an environmental law and natural resources law firm with one of the first environmental lawyers (then known as environmental strike force lawyers) of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources. This early partnership would prove pivotal to Rosen's legal career, as it would lead him to become one of the most influential lawyers in Pennsylvania mining, oil and gas, and natural resources.
Rosen quickly found himself immersed in litigation, regulatory and transactional matters involving coal, which was then most highly regulated energy and natural resources industry in Pennsylvania. He then added oil, natural gas, aggregates and other extractive industries, and waste disposal to his arsenal of knowledge.
He worked on numerous landmark Pennsylvania cases, a list that includes decisions regarding mineral leases (Olbum v. Old Home Manor and Williams v. Vesely) and officer, director and shareholder liability for corporate environmental violations (Kaites v. Commonwealth and W.C. Leasure v. Commonwealth).
He has served on various state advisory committees, including the Pennsylvania Ad Hoc Task Force on Mining Legislation and the Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board Rules Committee.
The legal profession is constantly evolving and that evolution only seems to have accelerated in recent years. What's the biggest change you've seen in the profession during your career?
Although many new concepts and trends have dramatically affected the legal profession during the past 40 years, the advent of technology and related information management stand out. Communication with clients, colleagues and opposing counsel now occurs in real time 24 hours per day, seven days per week. Lawyer down time and personal time have been curtailed as a result. Drafting and editing documents has been eased such that the length and number of documents per transaction both have increased dramatically (although the explosion of laws and regulation are contributing factors). Document archiving, retrieval and management have complicated litigation enormously.
I would be remiss in not mentioning the fulsome embrace by the legal profession of diversity in the work force, something which I find most gratifying and which makes me very proud. Our profession has benefited greatly from this phenomenon.
What is one thing about the profession that has remained unchanged over the years?
The twin pillars of collegiality and professional courtesy have been constants. These traits make practicing law enjoyable, but one constantly needs to work on them. We should never become self-satisfied with our level of collegiality and professional courtesy. There usually is room for improvement.
Name one thing you've learned over the course of your career that you wish you knew as a young lawyer.
Age and experience are irreplaceable. When I was a young lawyer, I felt my energy and enthusiasm would compensate for my lack of experience. As I matured as a professional, I came to believe that there is no substitute for experience. Because most good lawyers are autodidactic, we continue to improve as professionals as we age and broaden our experience.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpecial Section: 2024 Labor & Employment/Workers' Compensation
Insurers Are Misusing IMEs to Prematurely Cut Off Injured Workers' Benefits
7 minute readSupreme Court's Ruling in 'Students for Fair Admissions' and Its Impact on DEI Initiatives in the Workplace
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250