2019 Unsung Hero—Ilana Eisenstein
Philadelphia-based partner and co-chair of the appellate practice, Eisenstein, is former assistant to the Solicitor General and a former federal prosecutor with experience at every stage of litigation—from investigation, through trials, appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court.
June 17, 2019 at 10:53 AM
3 minute read
By The Legal Intelligencer
Ilana Eisenstein, DLA Piper
Philadelphia-based partner and co-chair of the appellate practice, Eisenstein, is former assistant to the Solicitor General and a former federal prosecutor with experience at every stage of litigation—from investigation, through trials, appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court.
Since her arrival at DLA Piper, her Supreme Court matter work has been impressive and addresses emerging legal issues businesses grapple with regularly.
In Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Eisenstein's team submitted a brief on behalf of nine national civil rights organizations urging the court to conclude that it is unlawful for businesses to discriminate against vulnerable populations. The brief expressed concern that the petitioners' proposed free speech exemption to anti-discrimination public accommodation laws could pave the way for businesses to lawfully discriminate against racial and other minorities.
In Dahda v. United States, the team drafted a brief on behalf of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers arguing, among other things, that new technology has transformed the power and pervasiveness of wiretapping, making the territorial limits imposed upon it by relevant law that much more important.
In United States v. Shockley, the team submitted a brief on behalf of six former Missouri state court judges and a former chief justice of the Missouri Supreme Court, urging the U.S. Supreme Court to grant a petition for certiorari filed by death row inmate Lance Shockley.
In United States v. Brice, the team drafted a petition for a writ of certiorari on behalf of an indigent prisoner. The petition raises claims under Brady v. Maryland based on the government's suppression of evidence that the only other potential perpetrator had a motive to commit the crime, as well as a claim that confessions by the only other potential perpetrator were inadmissible.
What career path would you have pursued if you weren't a lawyer?
I've always been interested in advocacy and public policy, but also enjoy analytical rigor. Before I settled on law school I considered becoming an economist.
Name a mentor or someone you admire.
I've benefited from many wonderful teachers, mentors, coaches and colleagues over the years. My clerkship with Judge Edward Becker was an important turning point in my legal career. His dedication to public service, irrepressible work ethic, love of the law, and respect for lawyers and the profession continue to inspire me.
What is the best advice you ever received?
“Do try not to be boring,” parting advice by then-Harvard President Neil Rudenstine at our graduation. Still aspiring to that one!
In 50 words or less, what does the legal profession need to do to prepare the next generation of lawyers?
Lawyers need real opportunities to serve as advocates, to work on cases of substance and significance, and to be apprenticed, not just “trained.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSeven Rules of the Road for Managing Referrals To/From Other Attorneys, Part 1
7 minute readMatt's Corner: RPC 8.4(d)—Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice
2 minute readThe Moving Goalposts of Overtime Exemption: Texas Judge Invalidates 2024 Salary Threshold Rule
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250