Litigators Vow to Streamline Dispute Resolution With New Mediation Firm
Peter Muhic and Peter "Tad" LeVan have founded MLA Dispute Resolution, drawing on their class action experience from Kessler Topaz and elsewhere.
June 26, 2019 at 01:34 PM
3 minute read
Two Philadelphia litigators are starting a new firm to mediate disputes that arise in class actions and complex litigation, aiming to make mediations more efficient for all sides.
Peter Muhic and Peter “Tad” LeVan have founded MLA Dispute Resolution, the pair announced Tuesday. LeVan will continue to operate his own firm, the LeVan Law Group, which he launched five years ago. Muhic, who was a partner at Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, has joined LeVan Law Group, where he will also continue a litigation practice alongside the mediation work.
The two lawyers previously worked together at Kessler Topaz. While they are both based in Philadelphia, they said the new firm will aim to handle matters all over the United States.
“One of the things we had been grousing about privately when we were doing the large class action work at Kessler Topaz was the time-consuming and inefficient mediations we would be doing,” LeVan said.
Typically, LeVan said, mediators have little interaction with the parties before the first day of mediation. And at the start of a mediation, the parties and their counsel end up spending a lot of time waiting around as the mediator gets to know the issues from each side individually.
“At the end of the [first] day, best-case scenario, you would be where you should have been when the day started,” LeVan said.
So at their new firm, parties and counsel will work with the mediator on an individual basis before everyone is gathered together in one place.
“To go through with the commitment of time and financial commitment to bring all of the client representatives together without there having been significant work in advance leads to often what we saw as an inefficient use of time and money,” Muhic said.
LeVan noted that he and Muhic have done plaintiffs- and defense-side work over the years, which gives them a useful perspective in mediating issues proactively. He said their format is aimed at resolving matters in fewer mediation sessions, which will save the parties time and money.
“There's no one better to explain the strengths and weaknesses of the claim to both sides of a suit than practitioners,” Muhic said.
While they will continue their respective litigation practices, LeVan said there will be a greater emphasis on their dispute resolution work. They have hired some staff, he said, but no other attorneys yet.
“We've had a very positive and strong early reaction from people,” Muhic said. “Attorneys from around the country have called to ask if we're willing to bring on additional mediators across the country.”
Muhic said the pair will leverage their existing relationships with law firms they have worked with to bring on mediation work. He and LeVan noted several niche areas in which they may be able to provide particular focus, given their experience: resolving class member objections and apportioning attorney fees at the end of large class actions.
“As mediators that are well acquainted with the issues,” Muhic said, “we can provide a very efficient, prompt and discreet way to resolve those attorney fee disputes.”
Kessler Topaz did not respond to a request for comment on Muhic's departure.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDon’t Settle for the Minimum: Finding Constitutional Claims Closer to Home
7 minute readSeven Rules of the Road for Managing Referrals To/From Other Attorneys, Part 1
7 minute readMatt's Corner: RPC 8.4(d)—Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250