Phila. Attorneys Adjusting to the 'Old Normal' in 6 Weeks Without E-Filing
While some attorneys have expressed frustration about the length of time the system has been down, lawyers said few significant problems have arisen in recent weeks and they have largely adapted to a new normal.
June 28, 2019 at 04:24 PM
5 minute read
Six weeks after the First Judicial District shut down its digital systems after being hacked, its website is back online and internal electronic work stations have been set up so court staff can enter filings. But the publicly accessible electronic docket and filing systems, the systems most heavily relied on by the city's legal industry, remain inaccessible.
While some attorneys have expressed frustration about the length of time the system has been down and the lack of information about the digital intrusion that lead to the shutdown, lawyers said few significant problems have arisen in recent weeks and they have largely adapted to a new normal.
“There are instances in which it's been a headache for certain types of practices, but most have adjusted to the new normal, or more like the old normal,” Albert Bixler, member-in-charge for Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott's Philadelphia office, said, referring to the fact that, with the electronic filing system down, all papers need to be filed in person at the courthouse.
Philadelphia's court system website has been shut down since the afternoon of May 21. According to a city spokesman, the move was done to “safeguard” the systems after the First Judicial District experienced a “virus intrusion on a limited number of computers.” The shutdown left the FJD's website, online civil docket search and e-filing system for civil and criminal cases inaccessible.
The court has offered little information about the intrusion so far, citing security concerns. Although court administrator Joseph Evers initially told The Philadelphia Inquirer on June 21 that the hack appeared to have originated from Russia, that claim was strongly and quickly walked back by court and city officials, including Mark Wheeler, chief information officer for the Kenney administration, who told The Inquirer on June 22 the investigation was still ongoing and the source was “not Russian.”
Regardless of the origin, court officials maintain that no court data was breached in the intrusion.
Over the past few weeks, the court's digital system has begun to show signs of life.
In mid-June, the court announced the Municipal Court Claims system was operational, and on Wednesday, the court announced its website was back up, although accessible only on Microsoft Edge, Safari and Firefox browsers.
For attorneys, those updates mean little, since the e-filing system and docket searches are still offline. In the meantime, law firms have adapted by having couriers file documents with the court in person and improvising ways to manually print out copies of dockets.
Rachel Gallegos, a senior staff attorney at Community Legal Service's homeownership and consumer rights unit, said the municipal court system getting back online was a big help, but simply determining the state of a new client's case, such as whether and when a lawsuit has been filed, can be difficult. Instead of a quick docket search, attorneys are much more reliant on court personnel and opposing counsel, who, Gallegos said, have by and large been very helpful.
Gallegos said frustration is ”a useless emotion” when you have clients potentially facing imminent sheriff sales.
“Six weeks in, you can only be angry so much,” she said. “We have to work with it, and work around it to the best of our ability.”
As of late June, civil attorneys said they had not heard of too many problems.
Raynes Lawn and Hehmeyer attorney Timothy Lawn, who is president of the Philadelphia Trial Lawyers Association, said he emailed the group's members soon after the initial shutdown to let them know they should come to him with any problems, but has only received one complaint.
“I think people are trying to make do,” he said. “Everyone's trying to cooperate and get along.”
Criminal defense attorney A. Charles Peruto said he was surprised the court system had been penetrable and that it has taken so long to recover. However, he also said there have been few problems at the Criminal Justice Center.
“Filing by hand brought back memories,” he said.
Discovery documents, he said, are being passed between parties in packages, the way discovery used to be done before the e-filing system, but doing things manually has not slowed down trials, he said.
In City Hall, where the civil cases are handled, things appeared to be running smoothly as well. Although some reported lines of up to an hour in the immediate aftermath of the shutdown, there were no lines at the filing office on Thursday, and two couriers said the system was running smoothly.
“Even when it does get crowded, they got it under control,” courier Isaac Finkelstein said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHigh Court Revives Kleinbard's Bid to Collect $70K in Legal Fees From Lancaster DA
4 minute readJudges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute readDispute Over Failure to Accommodate Disability Ends in $900K Settlement
3 minute readPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
Trending Stories
- 1Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 2Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
- 3Trump Moves to Withdraw Applications to Halt Now-Completed Sentencing
- 4Trump's RTO Mandate May Have Some Gov't Lawyers Polishing Their Resumes
- 5A Judge Is Raising Questions About Docket Rotation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250