Motorist Claimed Rear-Ender Caused Permanent Lumbar Injuries
On Aug. 22, 2015, plaintiff Marc Werksman, 58, was stopped on Rodi Road, waiting to turn left into a parking lot in Penn Hills, when his sedan was rear-ended by a sport utility vehicle. He claimed back injuries.
July 25, 2019 at 01:02 PM
3 minute read
Werksman v. Banas
$175,000 Verdict
Date of Verdict: Jan. 16.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Allegheny No. GD-16-002065.
Judge: Patrick M. Connelly.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Back injuries.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Jeffrey A. Pribanic, Pribanic & Pribanic, Pittsburgh.
Plaintiffs Experts: Bill Hennessey, physical medicine, Greensburg; Patrick P. Flannagan, neurosurgery, Pittsburgh.
Defense Counsel: Robert A. Loch and Andrew D. Shannon, Robb Leonard Mulvihill, Pittsburgh.
Defense Expert: Howard J. Senter, neurosurgery, Pittsburgh.
Comment:
On Aug. 22, 2015, plaintiff Marc Werksman, 58, was stopped on Rodi Road, waiting to turn left into a parking lot in Penn Hills, when his sedan was rear-ended by a sport utility vehicle. He claimed back injuries.
Werksman sued the driver, Tracy John Banas, alleging that he was negligent in the operation of a vehicle.
Banas stipulated to liability, and the case was tried on the issues of damages.
On Aug. 25, Werksman presented to a physician with complaints of pain to his low back. He was referred to a physiatrist, who, via an MRI and an EMG, diagnosed him with a herniation at lumbar intervertebral disc L5-S1, L4-5 stenosis and left-sided radiculopathy stemming from that level. Werksman complained of pain radiating into his left calf and the top of his left foot. He came under the care of a neurosurgeon, who prescribed physical therapy, pain medication and a series of epidural injections. Through spring 2016, Werksman treated conservatively, which, he alleged, provided only minimal relief. He was determined to be a surgical candidate.
On May 17, 2016, Werksman underwent a left L5 foraminotomy and a left L5-S1 microdiscectomy S1 foraminotomy. Following the surgery, Werksman resumed physical therapy and consulted with his surgeon through Oct. 7. No further treatment was rendered.
Werksman's neurosurgeon and physiatrist causally related his injuries and treatment to the accident. The physicians determined that Werksman suffered permanent injuries to his lumbar spine.
Werksman testified that he continues to experience back pain, which prevents him from sitting and standing for long periods and makes it difficult for him to bend and stoop. He also alleged continued numbness on the top of his left foot, which causes him to occasionally catch his left foot when walking. He sought damages for past and future pain and suffering.
Banas' expert in neurosurgery examined Werksman and conceded that he suffered an L5-S1 herniation that resulted in surgery. According to the expert, Werksman fully recovered from all injuries sustained in the accident, with the exception of minor left-foot numbness. The expert noted that Werksman's only current restriction is to avoid bending and lifting.
The jury determined that Werksman would receive $175,000.
Defense counsel has moved for a new trial.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs and defense counsel.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 22024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
- 3What We Heard From Litigation Leaders in 2024
- 4Akin and Simpson Create New Practice Groups With Integrated Teams
- 5Thursday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250