Motorist Claimed Rear-Ender Caused Permanent Lumbar Injuries
On Aug. 22, 2015, plaintiff Marc Werksman, 58, was stopped on Rodi Road, waiting to turn left into a parking lot in Penn Hills, when his sedan was rear-ended by a sport utility vehicle. He claimed back injuries.
July 25, 2019 at 01:02 PM
3 minute read
Werksman v. Banas
$175,000 Verdict
Date of Verdict: Jan. 16.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Allegheny No. GD-16-002065.
Judge: Patrick M. Connelly.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Back injuries.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Jeffrey A. Pribanic, Pribanic & Pribanic, Pittsburgh.
Plaintiffs Experts: Bill Hennessey, physical medicine, Greensburg; Patrick P. Flannagan, neurosurgery, Pittsburgh.
Defense Counsel: Robert A. Loch and Andrew D. Shannon, Robb Leonard Mulvihill, Pittsburgh.
Defense Expert: Howard J. Senter, neurosurgery, Pittsburgh.
Comment:
On Aug. 22, 2015, plaintiff Marc Werksman, 58, was stopped on Rodi Road, waiting to turn left into a parking lot in Penn Hills, when his sedan was rear-ended by a sport utility vehicle. He claimed back injuries.
Werksman sued the driver, Tracy John Banas, alleging that he was negligent in the operation of a vehicle.
Banas stipulated to liability, and the case was tried on the issues of damages.
On Aug. 25, Werksman presented to a physician with complaints of pain to his low back. He was referred to a physiatrist, who, via an MRI and an EMG, diagnosed him with a herniation at lumbar intervertebral disc L5-S1, L4-5 stenosis and left-sided radiculopathy stemming from that level. Werksman complained of pain radiating into his left calf and the top of his left foot. He came under the care of a neurosurgeon, who prescribed physical therapy, pain medication and a series of epidural injections. Through spring 2016, Werksman treated conservatively, which, he alleged, provided only minimal relief. He was determined to be a surgical candidate.
On May 17, 2016, Werksman underwent a left L5 foraminotomy and a left L5-S1 microdiscectomy S1 foraminotomy. Following the surgery, Werksman resumed physical therapy and consulted with his surgeon through Oct. 7. No further treatment was rendered.
Werksman's neurosurgeon and physiatrist causally related his injuries and treatment to the accident. The physicians determined that Werksman suffered permanent injuries to his lumbar spine.
Werksman testified that he continues to experience back pain, which prevents him from sitting and standing for long periods and makes it difficult for him to bend and stoop. He also alleged continued numbness on the top of his left foot, which causes him to occasionally catch his left foot when walking. He sought damages for past and future pain and suffering.
Banas' expert in neurosurgery examined Werksman and conceded that he suffered an L5-S1 herniation that resulted in surgery. According to the expert, Werksman fully recovered from all injuries sustained in the accident, with the exception of minor left-foot numbness. The expert noted that Werksman's only current restriction is to avoid bending and lifting.
The jury determined that Werksman would receive $175,000.
Defense counsel has moved for a new trial.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs and defense counsel.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Pa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation Pa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/38/82/ff7b611443519b770a19692401f4/weilheimer-neary-henry-767x633.jpg)
Pa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
![The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal' The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/01/Philadelphia-City-Hall-08-767x633.jpg)
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute read![Federal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank Federal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/ba/3b/495247be47fe8b0ba5fcd60e024b/citizens-bank-sign-767x633.jpg)
Federal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute read![Judge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury Judge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2024/07/18-wheeler-semi-truck-767x633.jpg)
Judge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250