Offit Kurman Hiring Spree Continues With 4 From Caesar Rivise
The mid-Atlantic midsize firm added four IP principals in Philadelphia.
July 30, 2019 at 11:38 AM
4 minute read
Offit Kurman's torrid pace of hiring hasn't stopped yet, as firm leadership looks to strike while the iron is hot. Most recently, the mid-Atlantic midsize firm has brought on a four-attorney intellectual property practice from Philadelphia-based IP boutique Caesar Rivise.
“I expect continued growth and frankly what we have found is that opportunities that are presenting themselves to us are growing by the year, if not the month,” Offit Kurman managing principal Timothy Lynch said.
The latest group addition, led by Lynn Terrebonne, also includes IP attorneys Michael Hogan, Pei-Ru Wey and Touhey Myer. All but Myer will practice out of the firm's Philadelphia office, with Myer based in Delaware. They all joined Offit Kurman as principals.
Gregory Grissett, who joined Offit Kurman in 2018 and now serves as chairman of its intellectual property practice group, said the new additions to his team complement its already established capabilities.
“Together with the existing group, the new attorneys position Offit Kurman as a formidable force for IP legal matters from trademark counseling and prosecution to patent drafting,” Grissett said in a statement.
Terrebonne, who had been at Caesar Rivise for more than three years, said her group was looking for a larger platform.
“What we were seeing from our clients was a desire to consolidate their legal work,” she said. “Being at a small IP boutique put us at a disadvantage.”
She said once discussions started with Offit Kurman, there really wasn't any need to look further.
“I didn't really need to convince the team of anything,” she said. “There was an across-the-board realization that we could grow our practice while continuing to service our existing clients.”
In addition to Grissett, Offit Kurman also added IP attorney Scott Lloyd in 2018 and New York-based IP attorney Laura Winston earlier this year.
Lynch said Offit Kurman had been looking for a practice group similar to Terrebonne's for some time, saying that as a “full service platform,” the firm needed the ability to both “help on the frontside, [and] protect our clients from litigation.”
Terrebonne's group has handled litigation involving design patents, trademark and copyright infringement, patent infringement and patent prosecution. The group's specialty, however, is Hatch Waxman litigation, an important area for Offit Kurman's pharmaceutical clients.
Both Terrebonne and Lynch said pharma clients are attempting to minimize their legal spend and law firm rosters, and that the Terrebonne group's skill set and Offit Kurman's larger IP footprint would be beneficial for all involved.
IP isn't the only area in which Offit Kurman has been expanding. Just earlier this month the firm absorbed 27 attorneys from Charlotte, North Carolina-based Horack, Talley, Pharr & Lowndes, expanding its reach to the Southeastern U.S.
“We manage to a strategic plan that calls for growth within our footprint,” Lynch said. “As long as it is responsible growth, we are looking to add good people,” he said.
Before her time at Caesar Rivise, Terrebonne spent time at Paul Hastings, Gieger, Laborde & Laperouse and Dechert, among other firms. She has a doctorate in pharmacology.
Hogan was a research chemist for several years before turning to law. He was formerly with Jones Day, Kenyon & Kenyon and Feldman Gale, among others.
Wey was at Caesar Rivise for almost six years. Before that she worked as a contract patent agent in the Washington, D.C., metro area. She has a doctorate from the Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy at Rutgers University.
Save for a one-year stretch at Stamoulis & Weinblatt from 2013-2014, Myer had been with Caesar Rivise since 2010. Before, he worked briefly as an assistant solicitor for Montgomery County, Maryland.
A representative for Caesar Rivise did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the departures.
|Read More:
Offit Kurman Takes on 27-Lawyer Group in Charlotte, Planting Flag in Southeast
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPartner Pay Transparency Is Eroding, Even if 'Black Box' Systems Haven't Caught On
6 minute readPa. High Court's Revision of Rule 7.1 Tightens Previous Guidance on Firm Names
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250