Teen Alleged Concussion, Neck Injuries in Collision
On Feb. 2, 2016, plaintiff Brian Butler, 16, was a passenger in a sedan that was stopped in traffic on Morris Road, near its intersection with Valley Forge Road, in Upper Gywnedd.
August 01, 2019 at 12:00 PM
3 minute read
Butler v. Doran
$63,000 Verdict
Date of Verdict: Feb. 21.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Montgomery No. No. 2017-4313.
Judge: Garrett D. Page.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Concussion, neck injury.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Gregory P. DiPippo, Bello, Reilley, McGrory & DiPippo Attorneys At Law, King of Prussia.
Plaintiffs Expert: Edward C. Galena, pediatrics; Chalfont.
Defense Counsel: Geoffrey S. Peterson, Bennett, Bricklin & Saltzburg, Blue Bell.
Comment:
On Feb. 2, 2016, plaintiff Brian Butler, 16, was a passenger in a sedan that was stopped in traffic on Morris Road, near its intersection with Valley Forge Road, in Upper Gywnedd. His car was rear-ended by a sport utility vehicle, which had been propelled forward after having been struck by a trailing vehicle that was being driven by John Doran. Butler claimed that he suffered injuries of his head and neck.
Butler sued Doran. He alleged that Doran was negligent in the operation of his vehicle. Doran stipulated to liability, and the case was tried on the issues of causation and damages.
Butler alleged that he struck the back of his head on his headrest during the collision. The next morning, he presented to his pediatrician with complaints of headaches and neck pain. Butler, a high school sophomore, missed eight days of school.
Butler began treating with physical therapy, which he did for three sessions through Feb. 23, 2016. His treatment included massages.
Following the physical therapy, Butler presented to a neurologist, who diagnosed him with a concussion, post-concussion syndrome and strains of his cervical and thoracic regions. He treated with four additional sessions of physical therapy through March 2016. No further treatment was administered.
Butler testified that his injuries and treatment sidelined him from participating in indoor and outdoor track teams as a high jumper, which he allegedly enjoyed and excelled at. He allegedly lost interest in the sport and no longer participated for the remainder of his time in high school. Butler also alleged that he experienced temporary memory impairment in August 2016, which he related to the accident. He also testified that he occasionally experiences neck and upper-back pain.
Butler sought damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The defense maintained that Butler underwent no imaging studies to support his injuries and that his treatment was limited. Doran's counsel noted that Butler had undergone three ImPACT tests for his concussion, but that the tests were not submitted into evidence.
The defense argued that Butler had fully recovered from any injuries he sustained in the accident.
The jury found that Doran's negligence was a factual cause of injury to Butler. He was determined to receive $63,000.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs and defense counsel.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readSupreme Court's Ruling in 'Students for Fair Admissions' and Its Impact on DEI Initiatives in the Workplace
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Pusillanimous Press
- 2Contract Lifecycle Management Company ContractPodAi Unveils Leah Drive
- 3'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 4Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 5Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250