Teen Alleged Concussion, Neck Injuries in Collision
On Feb. 2, 2016, plaintiff Brian Butler, 16, was a passenger in a sedan that was stopped in traffic on Morris Road, near its intersection with Valley Forge Road, in Upper Gywnedd.
August 01, 2019 at 12:00 PM
3 minute read
Butler v. Doran
$63,000 Verdict
Date of Verdict: Feb. 21.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Montgomery No. No. 2017-4313.
Judge: Garrett D. Page.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Concussion, neck injury.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Gregory P. DiPippo, Bello, Reilley, McGrory & DiPippo Attorneys At Law, King of Prussia.
Plaintiffs Expert: Edward C. Galena, pediatrics; Chalfont.
Defense Counsel: Geoffrey S. Peterson, Bennett, Bricklin & Saltzburg, Blue Bell.
Comment:
On Feb. 2, 2016, plaintiff Brian Butler, 16, was a passenger in a sedan that was stopped in traffic on Morris Road, near its intersection with Valley Forge Road, in Upper Gywnedd. His car was rear-ended by a sport utility vehicle, which had been propelled forward after having been struck by a trailing vehicle that was being driven by John Doran. Butler claimed that he suffered injuries of his head and neck.
Butler sued Doran. He alleged that Doran was negligent in the operation of his vehicle. Doran stipulated to liability, and the case was tried on the issues of causation and damages.
Butler alleged that he struck the back of his head on his headrest during the collision. The next morning, he presented to his pediatrician with complaints of headaches and neck pain. Butler, a high school sophomore, missed eight days of school.
Butler began treating with physical therapy, which he did for three sessions through Feb. 23, 2016. His treatment included massages.
Following the physical therapy, Butler presented to a neurologist, who diagnosed him with a concussion, post-concussion syndrome and strains of his cervical and thoracic regions. He treated with four additional sessions of physical therapy through March 2016. No further treatment was administered.
Butler testified that his injuries and treatment sidelined him from participating in indoor and outdoor track teams as a high jumper, which he allegedly enjoyed and excelled at. He allegedly lost interest in the sport and no longer participated for the remainder of his time in high school. Butler also alleged that he experienced temporary memory impairment in August 2016, which he related to the accident. He also testified that he occasionally experiences neck and upper-back pain.
Butler sought damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The defense maintained that Butler underwent no imaging studies to support his injuries and that his treatment was limited. Doran's counsel noted that Butler had undergone three ImPACT tests for his concussion, but that the tests were not submitted into evidence.
The defense argued that Butler had fully recovered from any injuries he sustained in the accident.
The jury found that Doran's negligence was a factual cause of injury to Butler. He was determined to receive $63,000.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs and defense counsel.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Morgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
- 2Litigating the Written Word: Parol Evidence Rule and the Gist of the Action Doctrine in Fraud Claims
- 3Why Wait? Arbitrate! The Value of Consenting to Arbitrate Your SUM Cases at NAM
- 4The Legal Status of Presidential Diaries Must Be Clarified
- 5Litigators of the Week: Shortly After Name Partner Kathleen Sullivan’s Retirement, Quinn Emanuel Scores Appellate Win for Vimeo
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250