Private Construction Businesses Could Have More Time to Follow New Lease Standards
Private companies are likely to get a year-long reprieve from implementing new standards that will significantly change how leases are presented on financial statements, bringing a sigh of relief for many in the construction industry (and plenty of others) who may have been slow to adhere to the coming, potentially disruptive changes.
August 02, 2019 at 11:19 AM
6 minute read
Private companies are likely to get a year-long reprieve from implementing new standards that will significantly change how leases are presented on financial statements, bringing a sigh of relief for many in the construction industry (and plenty of others) who may have been slow to adhere to the coming, potentially disruptive changes.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) voted in July to propose delaying the effective dates for a set of accounting standards, bumping back the effective date for the new lease standards on companies that are not public business entities one year to financial periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2020, (Jan. 1, 2021 for calendar-year-end companies) and for interim periods between fiscal years beginning after Dec. 15, 2021, (Jan 1, 2021 for calendar-year-end companies). Early adoption will be allowed, however.
The FASB expects to issue its proposal in mid-August, followed by a 30-day public comment period. The board will discuss the feedback at a future public meeting and could finalize the proposal as early as the fall.
The instant impact for private business owners in the construction industry is it gives more time to understand and implement these new measures before being caught off-guard. Many contractors, subcontractors, managers and related businesses in the construction industry have assets that will be affected by the new standards—but they might not know it.
That makes the present a good time for business owners and their financial and legal partners to review the new standards, audit how they will directly affect their reporting practices and make a plan as to how to apply them moving forward. The earlier they can do so, the better.
|What the New accounting Standards Say
Announced in 2016, the new accounting standards are aimed at making a “more faithful representation of a lessee’s rights and obligations arising from leases,” according to the FASB. The board said the previous standards failed to meet the needs of the users of financial statements because they did not require lessees to recognize assets and liabilities from operating leases on their balance sheets. The main thrust of the new standards, then, is to ensure lessees recognize all assets and liabilities created by leases with terms of more than 12 months.
Now, finance leases (referred to as “capital leases” in the previous guidance) and operating leases both should be recognized, but how they are reported on financial statements will differ:
Finance Leases
- Recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, initially measured at the present value of the lease payments, in the statement of financial position.
- Recognize interest on the lease liability separately from amortization of the right-of-use asset in the statement of comprehensive income.
- Classify repayments of the principal portion of the lease liability within financing activities and payments of interest on the lease liability and variable lease payments within operating activities in the statement of cash flows.
Operating Leases
- Recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, initially measured at the present value of the lease payments, in the statement of financial position.
- Recognize a single lease cost, calculated so that the cost of the lease is allocated over the lease term on a generally straight-line basis.
- Classify all cash payments within operating activities in the statement of cash flows.
The FASB also emphasizes disclosures “to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases.”
The full updated standards can be found here at https://www.fasb.org/jsp/FASB/Document_C/DocumentPage?cid=1176167901010&acceptedDisclaimer=true.
|How This Could Impact the Construction Industry
Open a business, and you likely won’t be buying everything with straight cash. That certainly holds true in construction, with businesses leasing all manner of sophisticated equipment, vehicles, trailers used for offices, real estate and countless other assets. Over years, these leases accumulate, some end, some are re-leased, and others are purchased. It’s surprisingly easy, without steadfast bookkeeping, to lose track of how certain assets are classified, especially if they’ve never been included as part of the balance sheet before.
If owners have been managing their finances through lines of credit or other financing, these new standards could shake up some businesses from a cashflow perspective. Current procedures may lead to tax liabilities or fines in the future, so they should be reexamined.
|What Construction Professionals Should Do Now
Private businesses likely will have another 19 months or so to get their financial reporting procedures in compliance with the new accounting standards, as the FASB appears committed to delaying the rollout. That doesn’t mean businesses should wait that long, though.
If they haven’t begun to address these changes, it’s good to start with a full review of what leases are creating assets and liabilities. There may be multiple leases that were never reported in the past that will now be required to be on future financial statements.
At the same time, businesses should reach out to their accounting partners, financial institutions or attorneys to help them navigate through this changing landscape. It’s possible some leases may need to be re-worked or re-worded to get the best tax or financial treatment. These professionals will also have the best understanding of the changes to the accounting standards and can help formulate a plan to address them appropriately.
Most of all, business owners must be proactive. When changes like these are on the far-off horizon, it’s easy to adopt a “we’ll worry about it then” attitude, but the future catches up in a hurry. The time to review and address these changes is now so that they are prepared.
Joshua Lorenz is an attorney at Pittsburgh-based law firm Meyer, Unkovic & Scott. He focuses his practice on construction law and litigation. He can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDelivery Driver's Slip-and-Fall Suit Slides Forward Against Equipment Rental Company
4 minute readPa. Construction Law Update: Best Practices Learned From 3 Recent Appellate Decisions
Troutman Pepper Accused of Inattentive Case Management in $59M Malpractice Suit
7 minute readPa. Appeals Court Rejects 'Statutory Employer' Challenge to $15.5M Worker Injury Verdict
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250