Private Construction Businesses Could Have More Time to Follow New Lease Standards
Private companies are likely to get a year-long reprieve from implementing new standards that will significantly change how leases are presented on financial statements, bringing a sigh of relief for many in the construction industry (and plenty of others) who may have been slow to adhere to the coming, potentially disruptive changes.
August 02, 2019 at 11:19 AM
6 minute read
Private companies are likely to get a year-long reprieve from implementing new standards that will significantly change how leases are presented on financial statements, bringing a sigh of relief for many in the construction industry (and plenty of others) who may have been slow to adhere to the coming, potentially disruptive changes.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) voted in July to propose delaying the effective dates for a set of accounting standards, bumping back the effective date for the new lease standards on companies that are not public business entities one year to financial periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2020, (Jan. 1, 2021 for calendar-year-end companies) and for interim periods between fiscal years beginning after Dec. 15, 2021, (Jan 1, 2021 for calendar-year-end companies). Early adoption will be allowed, however.
The FASB expects to issue its proposal in mid-August, followed by a 30-day public comment period. The board will discuss the feedback at a future public meeting and could finalize the proposal as early as the fall.
The instant impact for private business owners in the construction industry is it gives more time to understand and implement these new measures before being caught off-guard. Many contractors, subcontractors, managers and related businesses in the construction industry have assets that will be affected by the new standards—but they might not know it.
That makes the present a good time for business owners and their financial and legal partners to review the new standards, audit how they will directly affect their reporting practices and make a plan as to how to apply them moving forward. The earlier they can do so, the better.
What the New accounting Standards Say
Announced in 2016, the new accounting standards are aimed at making a “more faithful representation of a lessee’s rights and obligations arising from leases,” according to the FASB. The board said the previous standards failed to meet the needs of the users of financial statements because they did not require lessees to recognize assets and liabilities from operating leases on their balance sheets. The main thrust of the new standards, then, is to ensure lessees recognize all assets and liabilities created by leases with terms of more than 12 months.
Now, finance leases (referred to as “capital leases” in the previous guidance) and operating leases both should be recognized, but how they are reported on financial statements will differ:
Finance Leases
- Recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, initially measured at the present value of the lease payments, in the statement of financial position.
- Recognize interest on the lease liability separately from amortization of the right-of-use asset in the statement of comprehensive income.
- Classify repayments of the principal portion of the lease liability within financing activities and payments of interest on the lease liability and variable lease payments within operating activities in the statement of cash flows.
Operating Leases
- Recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, initially measured at the present value of the lease payments, in the statement of financial position.
- Recognize a single lease cost, calculated so that the cost of the lease is allocated over the lease term on a generally straight-line basis.
- Classify all cash payments within operating activities in the statement of cash flows.
The FASB also emphasizes disclosures “to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases.”
The full updated standards can be found here at https://www.fasb.org/jsp/FASB/Document_C/DocumentPage?cid=1176167901010&acceptedDisclaimer=true.
How This Could Impact the Construction Industry
Open a business, and you likely won’t be buying everything with straight cash. That certainly holds true in construction, with businesses leasing all manner of sophisticated equipment, vehicles, trailers used for offices, real estate and countless other assets. Over years, these leases accumulate, some end, some are re-leased, and others are purchased. It’s surprisingly easy, without steadfast bookkeeping, to lose track of how certain assets are classified, especially if they’ve never been included as part of the balance sheet before.
If owners have been managing their finances through lines of credit or other financing, these new standards could shake up some businesses from a cashflow perspective. Current procedures may lead to tax liabilities or fines in the future, so they should be reexamined.
What Construction Professionals Should Do Now
Private businesses likely will have another 19 months or so to get their financial reporting procedures in compliance with the new accounting standards, as the FASB appears committed to delaying the rollout. That doesn’t mean businesses should wait that long, though.
If they haven’t begun to address these changes, it’s good to start with a full review of what leases are creating assets and liabilities. There may be multiple leases that were never reported in the past that will now be required to be on future financial statements.
At the same time, businesses should reach out to their accounting partners, financial institutions or attorneys to help them navigate through this changing landscape. It’s possible some leases may need to be re-worked or re-worded to get the best tax or financial treatment. These professionals will also have the best understanding of the changes to the accounting standards and can help formulate a plan to address them appropriately.
Most of all, business owners must be proactive. When changes like these are on the far-off horizon, it’s easy to adopt a “we’ll worry about it then” attitude, but the future catches up in a hurry. The time to review and address these changes is now so that they are prepared.
Joshua Lorenz is an attorney at Pittsburgh-based law firm Meyer, Unkovic & Scott. He focuses his practice on construction law and litigation. He can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Judge Upholds $68.5M Verdict Over Construction Worker's Death
3 minute readDelivery Driver's Slip-and-Fall Suit Slides Forward Against Equipment Rental Company
4 minute readPa. Construction Law Update: Best Practices Learned From 3 Recent Appellate Decisions
Troutman Pepper Accused of Inattentive Case Management in $59M Malpractice Suit
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250