20,000 New Jersey DWI Cases Involving Breath Test Errors Headed for Panel
Some defense attorneys suspect that not all of the cases will have to be reheard.
August 06, 2019 at 02:00 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New Jersey Law Journal
New Jersey Chief Justice Stuart Rabner has assigned four retired Superior Court judges to decide thousands of drunken driving cases that were prosecuted using botched Alcotest readings.
Judge Robert Fall will lead the statewide effort to process the group of cases, and will be assisted by Judges Linda Baxter, Stephan Hansbury and Robert Reed. The judges were assigned in a Supreme Court order Aug. 2 to sit as municipal court judges with statewide jurisdiction.
The special judicial assignments follow the Supreme Court’s November 2018 ruling in State v. Cassidy that found a state police technician’s error in calibrating Alcotest devices rendered breath tests performed on those machines invalid. The court ruled in Cassidy that an estimated 20,667 cases based on readings from the improperly calibrated machines must be retried or abandoned. The ruling also relaxed the five-year deadline for bringing postconviction relief petitions if the case involves readings from improperly calibrated machines.
The issue stems from the discovery that Sgt. Marc Dennis of the state police was calibrating breath-testing machines in local police departments without following the procedure specified by the Supreme Court in its 2008 decision State v. Chun, which found the Alcotest 7110 scientifically reliable. Dennis was calibrating the machines with a thermometer that did not meet the standard specified by Chun. He performed calibrations of Alcotest devices for seven years in Middlesex, Monmouth, Ocean, Somerset and Union counties with the substandard thermometer.
In January, following a special master report by former Appellate Division Presiding Judge Joseph Lisa, the Supreme Court concluded that readings from Alcotest machines calibrated with the wrong thermometer were invalid.
The Supreme Court subsequently appointed Fall as a special master to manage the group of cases on a statewide basis, and to develop a scheme for resolving them. Fall subsequently recommended the appointment of a panel of judges to hear the group of cases.
Greggory Marootian, a Livingston, New Jersey, attorney who represents several defendants who were charged with drunken driving based on Alcotest readings from machines calibrated by Dennis, is filing postconviction relief petitions in those cases. But if a conviction is vacated based on a postconviction relief petition, the defendant could be prosecuted again, based on the arresting officer’s observations of the defendant and any videotape made at the scene, Marootian said.
A defendant who pleaded guilty has the right to withdraw that plea because they did not know about the issues with the Alcotest reading, Marootian said. If postconviction relief is granted and the guilty plea withdrawn, “it doesn’t mean the whole case is dismissed. Then it’s up to the prosecutor to dismiss or prosecute the case based on observations. Every case is unique, procedurally,” Marootian said.
Jeffrey Gold, a Cherry Hill, New Jersey, attorney who represents drunken driving defendants, said he believes the number of cases that will be reheard by the four judges will be far fewer than the estimated 20,000 that came from the Attorney General’s Office. Gold said his office received calls from many individuals who received notice from the attorney general that their drunken driving conviction was among the 20,000 that was based on Alcotest readings from machines calibrated by Dennis.
Most people may opt to not reopen their cases due to the cost of hiring an attorney and the uncertainty of any outcome, Gold said. The exception is any defendants who were subsequently charged with another drunken driving offense. Vacating the first conviction would reduce the penalty for a second case, said Gold, who represented the New Jersey State Bar Association as amicus curiae in Cassidy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllReal Property Sale Proceeds Must Be Paid First to Unavoided Portion of IRS Tax Lien
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250