Businesses: Get Familiar With Recent Changes to Del. Construction Law
Significant changes to the law were passed by Delaware’s 150th General Assembly that all construction firms doing business in the First State should be aware of.
August 15, 2019 at 11:10 AM
5 minute read
Significant changes to the law were passed by Delaware’s 150th General Assembly that all construction firms doing business in the First State should be aware of. Generally, these changes amend the Workplace Fraud Act (19 Del.C. Sections 3501-3515), create the Delaware Contractor Registration Act (19 Del.C. Sections 3601-3611), and establish an apprenticeship training requirement under the Large Public Works Contract Procedures statute (29 Del.C. Section 6962).
Senate Substitute 1 to Senate Bill 95 modified the Workplace Fraud Act and implemented new requirements for firms conducting construction business in the First State. This statute is specifically limited to the “construction services industry” and makes no distinction between public and private construction projects, or between commercial, industrial, or residential construction. The Workplace Fraud Act prohibits employers that engage in construction in the state of Delaware from misclassifying employees as so-called “1099 independent contractors.” The act provides a fairly detailed explanation of what is and is not considered construction services and should be consulted to determine whether a business falls within the act’s authority. This article, however, is concerned with the two important changes adopted by the noted legislation: businesses subcontracting with other businesses are now permitted to subcontract with other businesses that offer the same or similar services or that conduct the same core business; and all individuals or businesses engaging in construction must (as of Oct. 1, 2020) be registered with the new Delaware Contractor Registry Office in order to lawfully engage in construction work within the state.
The change to subcontracting represents a significant departure from what was previously unlawful conduct under the act. Until this amendment, businesses could be fined or debarred for subcontracting to another business or individual engaged in the same core business or offering the same services. This meant, for example, that a company offering plumbing services could not subcontract with a different plumbing company to do a portion of a plumbing contract. The act was interpreted to require fines for each such violation, with a violation being counted for each individual employee working pursuant to such a subcontracting arrangement. Under the change to the bill, this prohibition was removed, thus permitting subcontracting to any construction firm so long as they are registered under the additional major change introduced by the bill.
Regarding the noted registration, the bill also imposes a new requirement that a company register to lawfully carry out construction services in Delaware. To register, companies must pay a fee and certify that they are complying with a number of preexisting legal requirements (such as being registered to pay taxes, having proper licenses, and active workers’ compensation insurance). A company is then designated as a “registered” contractor and may be free to contract its services within Delaware. Businesses that fail to register and engage in constructions services, after the effective date, can be barred from doing further business in Delaware and fined at differing levels depending upon whether there was a knowing violation. Although the removal of the subcontracting prohibitions resolves a significant pitfall for the unwary, the new registry requirement could lead to severe consequences.
While workplace fraud applies to all contractors, Senate Substitute 1 to Senate Bill 48 (apprenticeship training) applies only to firms bidding on public works projects that are subject to prevailing wage requirements (that are not federal highway projects) and that have 10 or more total employees (note: the minimum does not distinguish between field personnel and office or shop employees). This amendment requires the bidding firm to have active training programs for apprentices and journeymen at the time that a project is awarded, though it is unclear what process exists for a registered journeyman program. If a contractor fails to maintain such a training program, the contractor may be suspended or debarred from bidding on public works projects for a period of up to five years (additional penalties exist for other violations of the procurement statute, including permanent debarment). To qualify for providing craft training, the contractor may either have their own program (approved by the Department of Labor) or participate in a collective training program as a company member of an organization that offers such training.
The apprenticeship amendments provide that the Delaware Department of Labor will promulgate regulations, but alleged violations may only be initiated by the contracting agency. Alleged violations are filed with the director of the Office of Management and Budget, who will hold a hearing to determine if a violation in fact occurred, and what penalty to assess. These decisions are appealable (on the record) to the Delaware Superior Court.
The upshot of these new laws and amendments is that construction is becoming a far more regulated field. Contractors and subcontractors, regardless of the type of construction (industrial, commercial, residential) and the ownership of the project (public, private) must take steps to ensure compliance now, and not delay until the effective dates of these changes.
Kevin Fasic, a principal with Offit Kurman, practices employment and construction law.
Anthony N. Delcollo, a principal with the firm, practices in the areas of employment law, commercial law, construction litigation, government regulations, professional licensing, and provides clients advice regarding the right to keep and bear arms.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250