Is Your Firm Missing the Mark? Use a Vision Board as Your Guide
As we embark on this ever-changing social climate, it’s more important now to have a clear vision for the future of your firm. A vision board is a great tool to help outline the goals and objectives of the firm as the climate around us continues to evolve.
August 15, 2019 at 12:37 PM
6 minute read
There is no question that the times are changing not only in our profession but across all industries. This means that the evolution of law should be changing as well. So your firm would be remiss to not progress in a time when movements such as #MeToo, Black Lives Matter and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), among many other significant social issues, affect not only our clients’ lives but our employees’ lives as well. This new era brings about new laws, new advocacy cases, new technology and therefore—new lawyers. While the numbers are growing, today we have more women- and minority-owned law firms entering the legal market than ever before. But while the number of women and minority lawyers overall in the industry are on the rise, they consist of starkly low numbers when compared to prior years where the number of social causes paled in comparison to today. As we embark on this ever-changing social climate, it’s more important now to have a clear vision for the future of your firm. A vision board is a great tool to help outline the goals and objectives of the firm as the climate around us continues to evolve.
Take a look back at your firm goals from 20 years ago, five years ago or even last year. Do those goals align with your firm’s path to success today? Does your firm even have a vision for the future of tomorrow and years down the road? A vision statement is the anchor point of any strategic plan—including your vision for your firm’s future. Having that clear vision for the future, asking the right questions, and engaging associates and staff will prepare you for the next wave of change. Remember that vision boards are meant to evoke change. Continue asking yourself are you aligned with the changing climate and am I truly serving my employees and clients. Using these four steps, your firm should be able to not only outline that vision for the future but doing so while ensuring it lands you and your firm in all the right places.
|What Is a Vision Board?
Consider a vision board as a mission statement 2.0, a clear representation that uses words and images to create concepts or goals. What personal vision boards and business vision boards have in common are that they both start with a purpose. When starting a vision board, are you asking yourself the right questions? First, what is it you want to accomplish? Are you creating a vision board to identify and correct any weaknesses within the firm or are you looking to build a stronger foundation and set new standards. Answering what may seem like a basic question, can often lead to a complex series of answers. Identifying weaknesses within any firm can be a complicated road. Are there certain members of the team that may be misaligned with your vision? Is it time to eliminate those members and seek individuals who may strengthen the core mission of your firm? Is it time to diversify your staff? Are you actively and aggressively seeking team members who may help identify certain issues or areas that are underrepresented within your firm? Is it time to promote from within? Are there certain team members who may help with your overall mission once they are placed in the right position to grow and succeed?
|Putting the Vision to Work—Aligning Actions With Goals
Start by asking the question, are we aligned with today’s social climate? It’s time to solicit internal input. Be ready to listen. New ideas and suggestions shouldn’t be dismissed but discussed further to find possible ways to either incorporate them on the vision board now or in the future. If you have to wait to incorporate certain ideas it’s vital to clearly explain why before moving on. Remember your vision board will have a greater degree of success when your team is part of the process. Once you have identified an overall vision; you can begin to branch out. Picture this vision as the centerpiece on a round table. Once that centerpiece is in place you can begin to structure how you plan on achieving that vision, much like adding accessories to the table. Be careful not to add too much at one time.
|Delegating Vision Tasks
Once you have identified an overall vision, which can also double as your mission statement, you can begin to branch out, consider adding accessories to the table. Continue engaging members of the firm in the vision board process assigning them task and timelines. With the staff’s engagement, the firm could delegate different teams to achieve certain objectives. For instance, the firm could set up committees and delegate members to organize a community service event, create a mentorship for incoming associates, create a D&I program for the firm or even organize CLE events for the firm. This is an excellent tool to engage employees, boost morale and increase camaraderie. Sharing the firm’s vision and aligning their own objectives and goals will motivate them to work harder toward making the firm successful.
|Reaping the Rewards of Success
Now that the work is done, it’s time to reap the rewards of success. It is important to acknowledge and praise all team members that assisted the firm in achieving its vision. Employees are not necessarily motivated by money, instead use intrinsic motivators such as being recognized for their hard work, growth and advancement and flexible work time. People want to be a part of something that is bigger than themselves, show them how their work has benefited the firm and how their work has aligned with visions of the firm. When morale is up, productivity is up. It’s a win-win for both the firm, employees and clients as well.
Shaun W. Jones, is the office administrator for Kolsby, Gordon, Robin & Shore, a catastrophic personal injury and complex litigation firm in Philadelphia. In addition to his role at the firm, he sits on the board of directors of Philadelphia Chapter of the Association of Legal Administrators. Contact him at [email protected] or 215-851-9700.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBottoming Out or Merging Up? Law Firms That Shuttered in 2024
Middle District of Pennsylvania's U.S. Attorney Announces Resignation
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250