The Pennsylvania Superior Court has rejected an argument by defendants in a personal injury case that they were prejudiced by evidence of the plaintiff’s workers’ compensation settlement because it led the jury to make assumptions about the defendants’ liability.
In Nazarak v. Waite, a three-judge appellate panel unanimously affirmed a Centre County jury’s award of $750,000 to plaintiff Seth Nazarak, who was injured when he was rear-ended in his work truck by defendant Rubin Waite Jr., who was also driving a work truck for his employer, defendant Haranin Construction.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]