Man Who Lost Bladder Awarded $10M in Delayed Diagnosis Case
A man who lost his bladder and prostate because of a delayed bladder cancer diagnosis has been awarded $10 million by a Lehigh County jury.
August 22, 2019 at 04:55 PM
3 minute read
Kline v. St. Luke's University Health Network
$10 Million Verdict
Date of Verdict: Aug. 20.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Lehigh No. 2017-C-2747.
Type of Action: Medical malpractice.
Injuries: Loss of bladder and prostate.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Paul Lauricella, McLaughlin & Lauricella, Philadelphia.
Defense Counsel: Howard Stevens, Gross McGinley, Allentown.
Comment:
A man who lost his bladder and prostate because of a delayed bladder cancer diagnosis has been awarded $10 million by a Lehigh County jury.
According to plaintiff Robert Kline's lawyer, Paul Lauricella of McLaughlin & Lauricella in Philadelphia, the jury found St. Luke's Hospital physician Dr. Lien B. Nguyen 60% liable; Dr. Christopher Stromski 25% liable; and Kline 15% liable for his injuries.
The jury's award was broken down into $2 million for past noneconomic damages; $6 million for future noneconomic damages; and $2 million for loss of consortium, according to Lauricella.
"I am still scratching my head as to why the nice folks at St Luke's decided to dig their heels in on this case," Lauricella said. "When the hospital decides to make no offer, it is guaranteeing a trial, and had better be prepared to accept the outcome when a jury tells it that the decision was boneheaded."
Howard Stevens of Gross McGinley in Allentown represents the defendants and did not respond to a request for comment.
Kline was seen at St. Luke's by third-year resident Nguyen, who was supervised by Stromsky. A CT scan revealed a "suspicious mass" in Kline's bladder that turned out to be malignant. The scan also revealed kidney stones, according to the plaintiff's pretrial memorandum.
Kline claimed that while Nguyen told him about the kidney stones, she did not mention the mass or the possibility of cancer. Kline claimed he was discharged without knowing about the mass. The plaintiff's court papers said the defendants tried to shift blame to Kline's urologist, who subsequently treated him.
As a result of delayed diagnosis, court papers said, Kline's bladder and prostate had to be removed, leaving him impotent. He also experienced infections due to surgery and is at an increased risk of potentially fatal urinary tract infections.
The hospital argued in its court papers that Kline was supposed to follow up with the hospital's urology center within a few days of his discharge and was told to do so in written discharge instructions.
"Unfortunately, plaintiff did not follow up with a urologist as he was instructed both verbally by Dr. Nguyen and, as well as in written discharge instructions. He received no treatment for any urological symptoms whatsoever until he presented to see his primary care physician, Dr. Amy Gourniak," defense papers said.
The hospital said the cancer was not discovered by Kline until a round of testing by other doctors was conducted two years after he went to St. Luke's.
—P.J. D'Annunzio, of the Law Weekly
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Courts Grapple With The Corporate Transparency Act
- 2FTC Chair Lina Khan Sues John Deere Over 'Right to Repair,' Infuriates Successor
- 3‘Facebook’s Descent Into Toxic Masculinity’ Prompts Stanford Professor to Drop Meta as Client
- 4Pa. Superior Court: Sorority's Interview Notes Not Shielded From Discovery in Lawsuit Over Student's Death
- 5Kraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250