Citi: Pa. Outpaces Industry in Revenue, but Also Expenses
Citi said 2019 will likely be a solid year for Pennsylvania-based law firms.
August 23, 2019 at 11:47 AM
3 minute read
Coming off a record 2018, law firms should be pleased with their performance in the first half of 2019, and Pennsylvania-based firms have even greater cause for celebration.
Local firms outperformed industry averages in several metrics in the first half, according to a recent survey by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
Revenue was up 6.3% at Pennsylvania firms surveyed, versus 4.1% industrywide. Demand, while flat across the industry, was a bit better among Pennsylvania firms, showing 0.5% growth.
Rate growth was about in line with industry averages, at 4.7% for Pennsylvania-based law firms.
"This from my perspective will still be a decent year for the firms in Pennsylvania," Citi Private Bank's Jeff Grossman said. Grossman said last year's legal industry growth was fueled by corporate M&A work.
"While many of those deals had concluded and there's much more uncertainty this year, the small or midmarket deals that are still transactional for midmarket-sized companies that are clients of our law firms, continued," he explained. "They're late in the game as we saw an uptick, but they're late in the game in terms of a slowdown."
However, both in Pennsylvania and industrywide, expenses grew more than revenue. Expenses were up 7.2% in the second half for Pennsylvania firms, versus 5.9% nationally. Compensation expenses were a major part of that, growing 9.1% at the local firms, while operating expenses were up 5.8%.
The increased compensation costs were due in part to increased associate salaries, which then "cascaded" through to staff pay, Grossman said. Additionally, local firms added more nonpartner lawyers—lawyer head count was up just 0.3%, while equity partnership ranks shrunk by 0.5%.
"They're re-leveraging their firms with less costly timekeepers," Grossman said.
"A lot of local firms have been laser-focused on maintaining their equity head counts," added Citi's Bradford Winton, who is based in Philadelphia. "It's a matter of focus on keeping the right talent in the doors."
The collections cycle in Pennsylvania differed from the industry average as well. While the average collections cycle lengthened by 1.6% in the first half industrywide, it was actually 0.8% shorter among Pennsylvania-based firms. That's a unique position for the market, particularly in a transactional economy, Grossman said.
Based on that, it's unsurprising that inventory increased by a lesser amount in Pennsylvania than industrywide, though not by much. Inventory was up 5.5% among Pennsylvania survey respondents.
"There is some demand growth in Pennsylvania, [and] there's inventory," Grossman said. "We actually think this will be a relatively strong year for Pennsylvania."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhiladelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
3 minute readPhila. Jury Hits Sig Sauer With $11M Verdict Over Alleged Gun Defect
3 minute readPhila. Attorney Hit With 5-Year Suspension for Mismanaging Firm and Mishandling Cases
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250