Citi: Pa. Outpaces Industry in Revenue, but Also Expenses
Citi said 2019 will likely be a solid year for Pennsylvania-based law firms.
August 23, 2019 at 11:47 AM
3 minute read
Coming off a record 2018, law firms should be pleased with their performance in the first half of 2019, and Pennsylvania-based firms have even greater cause for celebration.
Local firms outperformed industry averages in several metrics in the first half, according to a recent survey by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
Revenue was up 6.3% at Pennsylvania firms surveyed, versus 4.1% industrywide. Demand, while flat across the industry, was a bit better among Pennsylvania firms, showing 0.5% growth.
Rate growth was about in line with industry averages, at 4.7% for Pennsylvania-based law firms.
"This from my perspective will still be a decent year for the firms in Pennsylvania," Citi Private Bank's Jeff Grossman said. Grossman said last year's legal industry growth was fueled by corporate M&A work.
"While many of those deals had concluded and there's much more uncertainty this year, the small or midmarket deals that are still transactional for midmarket-sized companies that are clients of our law firms, continued," he explained. "They're late in the game as we saw an uptick, but they're late in the game in terms of a slowdown."
However, both in Pennsylvania and industrywide, expenses grew more than revenue. Expenses were up 7.2% in the second half for Pennsylvania firms, versus 5.9% nationally. Compensation expenses were a major part of that, growing 9.1% at the local firms, while operating expenses were up 5.8%.
The increased compensation costs were due in part to increased associate salaries, which then "cascaded" through to staff pay, Grossman said. Additionally, local firms added more nonpartner lawyers—lawyer head count was up just 0.3%, while equity partnership ranks shrunk by 0.5%.
"They're re-leveraging their firms with less costly timekeepers," Grossman said.
"A lot of local firms have been laser-focused on maintaining their equity head counts," added Citi's Bradford Winton, who is based in Philadelphia. "It's a matter of focus on keeping the right talent in the doors."
The collections cycle in Pennsylvania differed from the industry average as well. While the average collections cycle lengthened by 1.6% in the first half industrywide, it was actually 0.8% shorter among Pennsylvania-based firms. That's a unique position for the market, particularly in a transactional economy, Grossman said.
Based on that, it's unsurprising that inventory increased by a lesser amount in Pennsylvania than industrywide, though not by much. Inventory was up 5.5% among Pennsylvania survey respondents.
"There is some demand growth in Pennsylvania, [and] there's inventory," Grossman said. "We actually think this will be a relatively strong year for Pennsylvania."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPennsylvania Law Schools Are Seeing Double-Digit Boosts in 2025 Applications
5 minute readPa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
3 minute readAm Law 100 Lateral Partner Hiring Rose in 2024: Report
Trending Stories
- 1Veritext Legal Solutions Announces the Past Acquisitions of Three Alternative Dispute Resolution Firms
- 2Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 3LSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
- 4An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
- 5Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250