Meek Mill Free After Entering Plea to Misdemeanor as Judge Counsels Caution
Meek Mill agreed to plead guilty to a first-degree misdemeanor offense of carrying a firearm. The offense carries a sentence of up to five years in prison and a fine of as much as $10,000, but the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office had agreed that he deserved no further punishment.
August 27, 2019 at 11:15 AM
4 minute read
Moments before embattled rap artist Meek Mill stepped out of a Philadelphia courtroom free of any parole or probation for the first time in more than a decade, the judge overseeing his case offered words of caution.
"You know right from wrong. You know up from down. You know what to do. Don't be persuaded by anyone but yourself," Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Leon Tucker said. "Don't deviate from the path you're walking."
Mill, whose real name is Robert Rihmeek Williams, agreed to plead guilty to a first-degree misdemeanor offense of carrying a firearm. The offense carries a sentence of up to five years in prison and a fine of as much as $10,000, but the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office had agreed that Williams deserved no further punishment.
During a roughly 30-minute hearing Tuesday morning, the parties outlined the agreements, and Tucker accepted the plea deal, which ends a legal saga of more than a decade that stirred the Philadelphia legal community and helped fuel a national conversation about the criminal justice system.
"I know it's been a long road for you, and hopefully this will be the end of it," Tucker said, after accepting the plea.
Williams has been on probation since 2008 after he was convicted on drug- and gun-related charges. The case, however, caught national attention after the judge who initially handled his case, Philadelphia Judge Genece Brinkley, sentenced the hip-hop star to a two- to four-year prison sentence for a probation violation in November 2017. The sentence staggered the rapper's supporters, since neither the probation officer nor the prosecutor on the case had sought jail time, and eventually the sentence garnered national attention.
During the protracted appeals process, the case spurred hundreds of additional appeals involving cases handled by the arresting officer and led one court employee to be fired. The pleadings also raised a cloud over Brinkley's role in the matter. While Brinkley was removed from the case by the appeals court, she was not charged with wrongdoing.
After some newly discovered evidence came to light casting doubts about the credibility of Williams' arresting officer, who was the only witness at the trial, Williams redirected his appeal from focusing on the legality of the sentence to seeking to have the initial conviction vacated.
Although Brinkley, who handled his initial trial, denied those efforts in June 2018, the Superior Court in July granted Williams a new trial and tossed Brinkley from the case.
Questions, however, lingered about whether the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office would continue to pursue charges against Williams or simply drop the case.
Assistant District Attorney Paul George, who appeared on behalf of the prosecution during Tuesday's hearing, noted that Williams had no prior or subsequent convictions following his initial conviction and that Williams was successfully employed, which, George said, is a goal of parole and probation. Those factors, along with Williams admitting he carried a gun during the 2007 incident for which he was initially convicted, led prosecutors to agree to the deal, according to George.
"In view of the unique history of this case, all of the charges will be dropped and the commonwealth will not ask for a further penalty," George said.
Williams' attorney, Joe Tacopina of Manhattan, noted the rapper's recent philanthropic work, including donating to local schools, hosting a jobs fair, and helping found Reform Alliance, a nonprofit aimed at criminal justice reform.
Williams said little during the hearing, except to answer Tucker's questions about his understanding of the deal, his level of education and his satisfaction with his legal counsel.
After the plea deal was accepted and entered, Tucker noted that Strawberry Mansion High School—the school from which Williams said he dropped out—was the same school Tucker had graduated from decades before. Williams, Tucker said, was now a representative of the community.
"The court simply asks that you continue to do the good things you do recently," Tucker said. "People depend on you."
Moments later, Williams left the courtroom a free man.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEx-DLA Piper, Ballard Spahr Atty Accused of Aiding Video Game Company Founder's Misappropriation Scheme
5 minute readFrom M&A to Music Fest, Ballard Spahr Attorney Hosts Week-Long Jam Session With Help of Clients
5 minute read$43.5M Med Mal Verdict for Ex-Eagles Team Captain Withstands Appellate Challenge
Pa. Casinos Ask Court to Force State to Tax Skill Games Found in Stores Equally to Slots
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250