FJD's Electronic Docket Search Comes Back Online After Weeklong Outage
The week without a searchable online docket marked the second significant disruption of the court's electronic services this summer.
August 28, 2019 at 04:06 PM
3 minute read
A week after the First Judicial District's online docket search function stopped working, the site is back up and running.
The week without a searchable online docket marked the second significant disruption of the court's electronic services this summer—the first time being a disruption that lasted six weeks and affected both the external access to dockets and the court's internal filing system.
The recent weeklong disruption affected only the online search function for the Common Pleas Civil and Orphans' Court dockets. According to Gabriel Roberts, a spokesman for the FJD, the services had been temporarily suspended due to "application maintenance." Roberts noted at the time that the court is continuing to address tech issues as they arise.
"While the public-facing applications that we have are largely functional at this point, we are always making improvements to the system, especially following the events in May," he told The Legal last week.
Attorneys had reported to The Legal last week that, in the days before the court officially suspended the online search tool, they had been experiencing frequent outages.
On Wednesday, after the site was restored, Roberts declined to comment about whether the site coming back online signaled the end of the lingering problems, but said it was "a positive sign."
Along with problems accessing the online docket, attorneys who spoke with The Legal primarily reported periodic trouble filing dockets online and opening hyperlinked documents sent to them by the court system.
"For the most part the court's filing system works pretty well. There are sporadic periods where [a given filing] can't be found on the server," Nancy Winkler of Eisenberg, Rothweiler, Winkler, Eisenberg & Jeck said last week.
The problems had continued to pester attorneys in the wake of the much larger shutdown the court experienced earlier in the summer.
In late May, the court's website was initially shut down to "safeguard" its systems after the FJD experienced what a city spokesman said was a "virus intrusion on a limited number of computers."
The shutdown, however, left the First Judicial District's website, online civil docket search and the e-filing system for civil and criminal cases inaccessible for six weeks. Public access to court filings through the city's public computers for criminal records, filings, motions and appeals were also down.
The court has been circumspect about the intrusion that occurred.
During the weeks officials worked to get the court's online systems back online, attorneys resorted to using couriers to file papers, and turned to the honor system when it came to notifying parties that motions had been filed. Several law firms also began imposing internal deadlines that required lawyers to draft filings far in advance of the court-mandated filing deadlines in case couriers experienced traffic or long lines at the court.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStevens & Lee Hires Ex-Middle District of Pennsylvania U.S. Attorney as White-Collar Co-Chair
3 minute readJudge Tanks Prevailing Pittsburgh Attorneys' $2.45M Fee Request to $250K
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Being a Profession is Not Malarkey
- 2Bring NJ's 'Pretrial Opportunity Program' into the Open
- 3High-Speed Crash With Police Vehicle Nets $1.6 Million Settlement
- 4Embracing a ‘Stronger Together’ Mentality: Collaboration Best Practices for Attorneys
- 5Selling Law. How to Get Hired, Paid and Rehired
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250