PBA Recommends Retention for All Four Appellate Judges on November Ballot
Commonwealth Court Judges P. Kevin Brobson and Patricia A. McCullough and Superior Court Judges Anne E. Lazarus and Judith Ference Olson all received "recommended" ratings.
September 03, 2019 at 04:39 PM
4 minute read
The Pennsylvania Bar Association has recommended for retention the two Commonwealth Court judges and two Superior Court judges on the ballot this November, according to ratings the PBA's Judicial Evaluation Commission released Tuesday.
In retention elections, the PBA only has two candidate ratings, "recommended for retention" and "not recommended for retention." Commonwealth Court Judges P. Kevin Brobson and Patricia A. McCullough and Superior Court Judges Anne E. Lazarus and Judith Ference Olson all received "recommended" ratings.
The PBA said Brobson, who has been on the Commonwealth Court since 2010 and currently chairs the Judicial Conduct Board, "is recognized by members of the bar and bench as an excellent jurist who is even tempered, fair and knowledgeable." The PBA also called Brobson's opinions "well written, thorough and precise."
"He exhibits his dedication to the profession through community service, including acting as the jurist-in-residence at Widener University Commonwealth Law School and providing pro bono legal service," the PBA said. "The commission recommends the candidate's retention because of his consistent judicial excellence, even-keeled temperament, and commitment to the bar, bench and community at large."
McCullough, who has also been on the Commonwealth Court since 2010, currently chairs the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Appellate Court Federal Rules Committee and previously served on the Allegheny Court of Common Pleas.
"Those who were interviewed concerning the candidate describe her as conscientious, hardworking, fair minded, open to new concepts and dedicated," the PBA said. "The attorneys who come before her and her fellow judges consider her to be professional, well prepared and having a firm grasp of the facts and the law."
McCullough also received credit for her active roles in both the PBA and Allegheny County Bar Association, including serving as a course planner for continuing legal education courses, and her involvement in the community, including serving on the United Way Strategic Planning Committee, the Pennsylvania Catholic Committee on Social Concerns and Immigrants Against Domestic Violence Task Force.
"The candidate's character and integrity make her well suited for her position on Commonwealth Court," the PBA said.
As for the Superior Court candidates, the PBA said both Lazarus and Olson, each of whom has served on the court for a decade, are regarded among their peers as "capable" and "hardworking."
Lazarus' judicial temperament, the PBA said, "has been described as 'perfect,' and her opinions are thoroughly researched and well written."
"The candidate was active in creating programs in the First Judicial District relating to educating the public as to custody procedures, which served as the template for the current statewide custody conciliation program," the PBA said, noting that, including her time as a Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas judge, Lazarus has served on the bench for nearly 29 years. "In addition to her work on the Superior Court, the candidate teaches courses to both law students and lawyers throughout the commonwealth."
The PBA commended Olson for penning "well-written opinions that are easily followed and understood, and which demonstrate appreciation of the effects legal decisions have on the lives of the parties involved."
"She is described as talented, bright, prepared and fair in her application of existing law to the cases before the court," the PBA said. "The candidate has actively participated in community and charitable boards and is loyal to the missions and purposes of the institutions. She also speaks at bar association programs, giving practical advice to those in attendance."
In January and March, the PBA issued two batches of ratings for the judicial candidates seeking to fill two vacant seats on the Superior Court.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Jury Hits Sig Sauer With $11M Verdict Over Alleged Gun Defect
3 minute readJudge Approves $1.15M Settlement, Reduces Attorney Award in COVID-19 Tuition Reimbursement Suit
4 minute readDechert 'Spark Tank' Competition Encourages Firmwide Innovation Focus
Trending Stories
- 1Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
- 26th Circuit Judges Spar Over Constitutionality of Ohio’s Ballot Initiative Procedures
- 3On The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
- 4After Mysterious Parting With Last GC, Photronics Fills Vacancy
- 5Latham Lures Restructuring Partners From Weil, Paul Weiss
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250