Ex-Homicide Prosecutors Say Krasner Fired Them Because of Their Age
The lawsuit, filed in federal court by Carlos Vega and Joseph Whitehead, claims that they were casualties of Krasner's push to reform the District Attorney's Office by filling the ranks with younger prosecutors.
September 05, 2019 at 04:08 PM
4 minute read
A pair of former veteran homicide prosecutors have filed a lawsuit against Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner and the city, claiming their employment was terminated because they were deemed to be too old.
The lawsuit, filed in federal court by Carlos Vega and Joseph Whitehead, claims that they were casualties of Krasner's push to reform the District Attorney's Office by filling the ranks with younger prosecutors.
During his first week as the city's district attorney, Krasner asked 30 veteran prosecutors to resign. The office faced staffing shortages for months until the office replaced its losses, in most cases with recruits fresh out of law school.
"Throughout the course of his campaign for DA, defendant Krasner made a series of public statements that reflected his strong bias against and stereotypical views of older prosecutors, and his unwavering preference and affinity for young prosecutors," the lawsuit said. "Defendant Krasner even declared publicly that if he were elected, he would fire older prosecutors and replace them with young prosecutors."
Vega and Whitehead were 61 and 64, respectively, when Krasner asked for the resignations Jan. 5, 2018, three days after he was sworn into office, the lawsuit alleged. The pair refused, and were told to either clear out voluntarily or be fired, according to the complaint.
"Plaintiffs refused to tender their resignations on January 5, 2018, they were instructed by the city to clear out their offices that day, thereby ending their careers with the city after a combined 63 years of loyal and dedicated service," the lawsuit said.
"After they were evicted by the city, plaintiffs were replaced by or had their cases reassigned to substantially younger, less experienced prosecutors who were not as qualified as plaintiffs," the lawsuit went on. "After assuming office, defendant Krasner continued to make public remarks that revealed his antipathy toward older prosecutors and his partiality for young prosecutors; and since taking office as district attorney, he has hired many young prosecutors, a large number of whom are recent law school graduates."
A spokeswoman for District Attorney's Office said the office does not comment on pending litigation.
The plaintiffs are represented by Sidney Gold and Robert Davitch.
In a joint statement, the lawyers said: "Mr. Whitehead and Mr. Vega are aware of negative public statements made by Mr. Krasner about the group of assistant district attorneys who were forced out or fired in January 2018. To the extent that these general comments by Mr. Krasner apply to Mr. Whitehead, Mr. Vega, or their job performance, ethics or integrity as prosecutors, they look forward to the opportunity to disprove the accusations and to show that they are pretexts for age discrimination."
Last year, Krasner's office branded the changes as necessary.
"Change is never easy, but DA Krasner was given a clear mandate from the voters for transformational change," former office spokesman Ben Waxman said in a 2018 statement to the press after the firings. "Today's actions are necessary to achieve that agenda. He looks forward to working as a team with the dedicated, talented, and hardworking employees of the DAO to make it the best prosecutorial office in the nation."
Sources told The Legal last year that the mass exodus in the early days of Krasner's administration caused disruption in the city's criminal courts and led to increased workloads for line prosecutors.
When relief came in autumn of 2018, it came in the form of new hires ranging from former Big Law lawyers to attorneys whose only prior experience came from interning. The hires came from law schools across the country, such as Harvard, the University of Michigan and Stanford, although 21 of the 38 new hires attended schools in Pennsylvania.
Several also had experience interning with prosecutors offices across the country, including U.S. attorney's offices in the District of Columbia and the Eastern District of New York, as well as the Bucks County District Attorney's Office and the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office. Two of the new hires had previously also worked as paralegals for the office.
Some of the other new hires have had intern experience with defense organizations, including the Federal Community Defender Office in Pennsylvania and the Broward County Public Defender's Office.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppeals Court Rules Pittsburgh School District Immune to Suit Over Sex Abuse of Disabled Student
4 minute readPa. Court Denies Procedurally Deficient Request for Delay Damages in $4.1M Personal Injury Verdict
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 2US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 3Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 4McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
- 5Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250