Plaintiff Forced to Retire After Fall on Defective Sidewalk
On May 3, 2017, plaintiff Nahid Ghanadioff, 64, a dental assistant, tripped and fell on a sidewalk at a Produce Junction store on Bryn Mawr Avenue, in Northwest Philadelphia. She suffered fractures to her knee and ankle.
September 12, 2019 at 11:33 AM
5 minute read
Ghanadioff v. Produce Junction
$500,000 Verdict
Date of Verdict: June 12.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Philadelphia No. 171204137.
Judge: M. Teresa Sarmina.
Type of Action: Premises liability, slip, trip and fall.
Injuries: Knee and ankle fractures.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Leonard K. Hill and Susan B. Ayres, Hill & Associates.
Plaintiffs Experts: Gregg W. Frazier, engineering; Malvern; Randall N. Smith, orthopedic surgery, Philadelphia.
Defense Counsel: Thomas F. Reilly and Julia C. Rogers, Chartwell Law Office, Philadelphia.
Defense Expert: Paul A. Horenstein, orthopedic surgery; Philadelphia.
Comment:
On May 3, 2017, plaintiff Nahid Ghanadioff, 64, a dental assistant, tripped and fell on a sidewalk at a Produce Junction store on Bryn Mawr Avenue, in Northwest Philadelphia. She suffered fractures to her knee and ankle.
Ghanadioff sued Produce Junction. She alleged that it was negligent for allowing a dangerous condition to exist.
Ghanadioff claimed that her foot got caught in a crack in the sidewalk, causing her to fall. Her counsel cited a photograph of the crack, which measured 4 inches wide and 1 inch deep. Ghanadioff's counsel argued that Produce Junction failed in its duty to maintain its property in a reasonably safe condition for patrons.
Ghanadioff's expert in civil engineering testified that the crack constituted a dangerous condition that violated the Philadelphia Maintenance Code and other applicable engineering standards.
The defense contended that the sidewalk's condition was open and obvious and one that Ghanadioff should have appreciated and avoided altogether.
Following the accident, Ghanadioff drove home and was later taken by her husband to an emergency room. She had complaints of pain in her left knee and right ankle. Ghanadioff was diagnosed with a fracture of her right ankle. Due to excessive swelling of her left knee, it was determined that a diagnosis could not be made. Her knee was fitted with a brace, and her right foot was placed in a boot. The next day, Ghanadioff presented to an orthopedic surgeon. The surgeon drained her knee, which had been swollen with blood. Ghanadioff was diagnosed with a comminuted fracture of the proximal tibia.
For the next two months, Ghanadioff remained bedridden. She then began a course of physical therapy that consisted of exercises. She remained on this course for three months. Two months post-accident, Ghanadioff came under the care of a podiatrist, who diagnosed her with plantar fasciitis of the left heel. Ghanadioff claimed that the condition developed after her gait had been altered as a result of her knee injury. She received two pain injections to her left heel. Ghanadioff continued to consult with her podiatrist and orthopedic surgeon into 2019. They administered a combined total of 10 injections to her left knee. These included two steroid injections and eight fluid injections. At the time of trial, Ghanadioff continued to consult with her physicians. She sought to recover $5,800 in medical costs.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readSupreme Court's Ruling in 'Students for Fair Admissions' and Its Impact on DEI Initiatives in the Workplace
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Pusillanimous Press
- 2Contract Lifecycle Management Company ContractPodAi Unveils Leah Drive
- 3'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 4Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 5Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250