Race/Ethnicity of the Lawyer at Trial: Tips for Overcoming Bias
Anyone who has practiced the law in jurisdictions other than the one they grew up in, realizes that the practice of the law, and the world in general, is full of color and that people come in all sorts of shapes, races, ethnicities and genders.
September 12, 2019 at 11:21 AM
8 minute read
I have a unique practice that affords me the opportunity to practice law and try cases throughout the United States. Just in the past five years, I have had jury trials in Fort Payne, Alabama; Brooklyn, New York; Riverside, California; Philadelphia; Pennsylvania; Tulsa, Oklahoma and Plattsburgh, New York. I have also mediated or appeared in cases in Washington, D.C.; Boston; Massachusetts; Houston, Texas; Baltimore, Maryland; Pensacola, Florida; Miami, Florida; Los Angeles, California; Denver, Colorado; Atlanta, Georgia; San Francisco; Seattle; Richmond, Virginia; Lubbock, Texas and Anchorage, Alaska. While there are pros and cons to my practice (the biggest con being that the transitory nature of my practice does not afford me the opportunity to form long-term relationships with members of the bar and the judiciary), my practice does give me an opportunity to appear in places and before people (juries, attorneys and judges) from different backgrounds (social economic, racial or otherwise (the biggest "otherwise" being Northerners versus Southerners), and as an extrovert, I do enjoy meeting new people.
Many people like to say, "the law is colorblind," When I hear this, I (having had a retinal detachment in the past) like to refer them to a good ophthalmologist to get their eyes checked on. Anyone who has practiced the law in jurisdictions other than the one they grew up in, realizes that the practice of the law, and the world in general, is full of color and that people come in all sorts of shapes, races, ethnicities and genders. These are things that should not be overlooked to create an unrealistic utopian idea, rather these differences should be celebrated. That said, anyone who is not delusional also knows that these differences are not celebrated by everyone, and at some point, you will have people on your jury who will be tainted by explicit or implicit bias against you. As a trial lawyer, you have to be aware of this fact and how said biases may affect your case. Most of the time, when we think about race, gender, sexual orientation, etc., we think of it in terms of how our clients will be perceived. Rarely, mostly because our large egos do not allow us to see it, do we think about it in terms of how we are perceived by the jury. That said, as a 6'4" Asian American male, who has to sometimes try cases in areas where my presence literally increases the Asian American (sometimes general minority) population of a jurisdiction, I have become acutely aware of how a jury may perceive me.
In July 2018, Cynthia Cohen published an article titled "A Guide to Implicit Bias and Explicit Views of Lawyers' Race and Gender" in the ABA section of litigation's trial practice website. In the article Cohen outlined her original study's findings on peoples' perceptions of lawyers, focusing on race and gender. While more studies need to be conducted (and a lot more discussion has to be had), Cohen's study produced several interesting insights. I highlight a few of them here, and I highly recommend that you read the article for a more in-depth discussion. Of interest to me, were the following two findings: her mock jurors preferred to be represented by people of their own race (except, Asians who preferred a "Caucasian male" over an "Asian" attorney—seriously, I am going to have to have a talk with Asian Americans about this); and "Case issues are more determinative of verdict than trial lawyers' race and gender." With respect to said "case issues", Cohen noted, "In the scenario [she gave the mock jurors], issues determined verdict (e.g., accountability in the system is broken, shooting was intentional, police always lie, police officer feared "own life" was in danger, and the homeless person had a gun)". Additionally, "Mock jurors' race and gender did not determine verdict."
Based on my own personal experiences, these two points have merit. That said, while I do believe "trial theme" or "case issues" win the day, a good trial lawyer knows that you do not get there until you have overcome the initial explicit or implicit biases that jurors carry into the box with them; how can you argue issues if they do not yet hear you? Below, I offer a few tips I have learned that I believe may help you get over the initial bias.
|Confront the Elephant in the Room Early
Look, everyone knows you are an outsider, so confront it head on and confront it early. A former colleague of mine once had a three-week products liability trial. At the end of the trial, the parties decided to poll the jury. One of the jurors stated, when asked what he will remember most from the trial, "I couldn't stop wondering where the plaintiffs attorney got his monogrammed shirts from."
You do not want your jurors to spend the entire trial trying to "figure out your story." While it may not be ethical or allowable under the rules of a particular jurisdiction to go into your background or get personal, you should attempt to answer the question that every juror who is not used to seeing someone like you is asking in their heads, and do it early enough in the trial, so that the jurors can focus on the winnable case issues more than on trying to figure out your story.
In jurisdictions where I am noticeably in the minority, like the one in Fort Payne, Alabama (where I increased their Asian American population to four for about a week and a half), I used the following phrase during my opening: "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, let me let you in on a secret … I'm not from around here." From there, my strategy is usually to use a universal theme ("truth, justice and the American way") to endear me to the jury; and to show them that we are not that different (even as a "yankee").
|Be Genuine
Endearing yourself to the jury does not mean imitation. Once in Tulsa, during a trial prep session with local counsel, it was suggested by a member of his staff that "Will should get and wear a nice pair of cowboy boots." Mind you, I do not think you have to be of a certain race or ethnicity to rock cowboy boots. However, I personally have never worn cowboy boots, and frankly, they just are not my style. And while jurors may not know much about you, what they can generally sense is when you are pandering or being disingenuous. So, unlike the "national" politicians who come to Philadelphia and order a cheesesteak from Pat's with American Cheese, just do not do it. Be yourself, regardless of what audience you are playing in front of, most people appreciate genuineness … unless (see below).
|Surprise, People Generally Do Not Like Attorneys
Let's face it, there are some of us (attorneys) who are simply full of themselves. The impeccably tailored suit, the always coifed hair, the pocket square, the watch that screams "I have money and you don't," and the associates trailing behind you carrying all the trial materials while you enter the courtroom empty handed. Do not get me wrong, people appreciate a nice suit and a well-dressed attorney. However, know your audience, if you are in a more suburban or rural area, do not try to stick out like a sore thumb. Your court attire in Manhattan in New York City should probably be toned down in Manhattan, Kansas. While this is generally a good idea for all attorneys, for minority attorneys this may be more important. See, not only are you battling a potentially negative stereotype about your race, gender or sexual orientation, you may also be dealing with a negative stereotype about your profession. I only mention this point here because, when facing an intimidating situation, the natural reaction is stay with what is familiar. However, sometimes you can stay with the familiar to your detriment.
|You Can Not Win Them All
As you know, you cannot win them all. There will be times when no matter what you do, you will not be able to win over a juror. And frankly, as a trial lawyer, you have to know that going in and accept it. You can only control what you can control. To the extent that you can, obviously, create a record. If the prejudice is overt and explicit, attempt to get the juror dismissed. That said, you will never be liked by everyone you appear in front of, no matter what you do or say. However, addressing that elephant in the room, goes a long way to getting your jurors to get past it so you can get to the case issues.
Will Sylianteng is the managing member of Wes Litigation Group, which he founded in 2013. He focuses his practice on litigation, subrogation and recovery, insurance coverage/bad faith and e-discovery. Contact him at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250