As State Prosecutors Keep Teaming Up, Another State AGs Practice Is Born
A former Pennsylvania executive deputy attorney general is establishing a team focused on state AGs at Blank Rome.
September 13, 2019 at 04:23 PM
4 minute read
As state prosecutors around the country continue to band together to take on corporations and federal policies, a number of national law firms have established teams of lawyers to help clients address the amped-up regulatory and enforcement pressures.
After bringing back partner Jonathan Scott Goldman from a stint in Pennsylvania's top prosecutor's office, Blank Rome is doing the same, establishing a state attorneys general team.
Goldman rejoined Blank Rome this month after two and a half years as executive deputy attorney general for the Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General. Before that, he was a partner at Blank Rome, where he had practiced law for a decade.
"The federal government is not really regulating right now," Goldman said, so instead, prosecutors in states including Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, California, Illinois and Washington, among others, have stepped into that role.
"There's been a real shift. Our clients are seeing that and feeling that and need to have counsel to guide them through these state processes," said Blank Rome managing partner and CEO Grant Palmer. In addition to Pennsylvania, the firm's New York office has strong relationships with state prosecutors there, he noted.
Palmer said very few clients and industries are not feeling the effects of "larger-impact litigation" by state prosecutors. It's particularly relevant for the firm's clients in the pharmaceutical space, he said, and Blank Rome has been working with them in that regard.
In his time at the OAG, Goldman had the opportunity to work with other prosecutors around the country on investigations and litigation, he said, giving him insight into "the essential issues for attorneys general and how they work."
"It's a really important time to go back and be able to help clients in this environment," Goldman said. "Companies are aware of the power of the state attorneys general, and they're nervous a lot of time."
That's not necessarily new—regulation by state attorneys general has been an area of increased focus for a number of law firms in recent years.
Among other Philadelphia-based firms, Cozen O'Connor established such a practice several years ago, and Pepper Hamilton also advertises a state attorneys general practice on its website. Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft, Buckley, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, Squire Patton Boggs, Venable, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, King & Spalding, Hunton Andrews Kurth and Alston & Bird are among other national firms that have built practices around state attorneys general offices.
The related skill set isn't totally new to Blank Rome, either, Goldman noted. But what is a more recent addition, given his return to the firm, is a "current, real-time understanding of, essentially, the prosecutors—what the agendas are, what's driving a lot of the investigations, what's making them tick."
Palmer said between 20 and 35 lawyers at the firm have experience dealing with state prosecutors and regulation, and will likely be part of the new team.
Goldman said he doesn't see his move back to private practice as switching sides. Instead, he said, it's about helping clients avoid pitfalls that lead to litigation with state AGs, or working on agreements that will be a win for the prosecutors from a regulatory perspective while reducing harm for the corporate client.
"At the end of the day, if you are a good corporate actor, and most corporations want to do good, they want to follow the law. The law is just often confusing, and that's why companies need lawyers," Goldman said.
In addition to issues involving state prosecutors, Goldman will maintain a tax practice, focused largely on state and local tax matters.
The OAG did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Goldman's departure.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDon’t Settle for the Minimum: Finding Constitutional Claims Closer to Home
7 minute readSeven Rules of the Road for Managing Referrals To/From Other Attorneys, Part 1
7 minute readMatt's Corner: RPC 8.4(d)—Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
- 2A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Becoming Clerk of the Forum
- 3Pa. Supreme Court Taps New Philadelphia Family Division Administrative Judge
- 45th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
- 5Mediators for the Southern District of New York Honored at Eighth Annual James Duane Awards
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250