Motorcyclist, Motorist Dispute Cause of Rear-End Crash
On June 10, 2017, plaintiff Jabari Savage, 37, a restaurant worker, was motorcycling on Hunting Park Avenue, in North Philadelphia. Savage rear-ended a sedan and was ejected from the motorcycle. He suffered facial injuries, including injuries to his teeth and jaw.
September 19, 2019 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
Savage v. Sharif
$300,000 Verdict
Date of Verdict: May 22.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Philadelphia No. 170900208.
Judge: Marlene F. Lachman.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Facial injuries, including injuries to his teeth and jaw.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Francis J. O'Neill Jr., van der Veen, O'Neill, Hartshorn, and Levin, Philadelphia.
Plaintiffs Expert: Karthik Rajasekaran, otolaryngology, Philadelphia.
Defense Counsel: Simi Mayall, Styliades Mezzanotte & Hasson, Philadelphia.
Defense Expert: Janci C. Lindsay, alcohol toxicology; Houston, Texas.
Comment:
On June 10, 2017, plaintiff Jabari Savage, 37, a restaurant worker, was motorcycling on Hunting Park Avenue, in North Philadelphia. Savage rear-ended a sedan and was ejected from the motorcycle. He suffered facial injuries, including injuries to his teeth and jaw.
Savage sued the driver, Tamika Sharif. Savage alleged that Sharif was negligent in the operation of her vehicle.
Savage and a friend, who was also riding a motorcycle at the time, alleged they were riding in the left lane when Sharif, driving in the right lane, abruptly changed lanes and cut off Savage.
Savage said he was unable to stop in time and struck the rear of Sharif's vehicle.
The defense maintained that Savage was liable for the collision, as he tested at a blood alcohol level of 0.215 following the accident. The defense's expert in toxicology testified that, given that Savage's blood alcohol level was well over the legal limit, his reaction time, depth perception and judgment would have been severely impaired while operating a motorcycle. The defense asserted that, even if Sharif cut off Savage as alleged, Savage was too impaired to have properly stopped in time to avoid striking the vehicle.
Savage testified that, despite his inebriation, his perception and ability to operate the motorcycle were unaffected, which was reportedly corroborated by his friend.
Savage was taken by ambulance to a hospital and was admitted. He was diagnosed with six missing teeth, consisting of his two front teeth and four bottom teeth, and 11 fractures to his face, which included fractures to his mandible, both orbital bones and his nasal bone. Savage was intubated with a tracheostomy. Over the course of 19 days, he underwent three open reduction procedures with internal fixation to repair his facial fractures. Plates and screws were implanted.
Upon discharge, Savage recuperated at home in the ensuing weeks and consulted with his surgeon. No further treatment was administered.
Savage confirmed that he had made a good recovery and that he plans to receive implants to replace his six missing teeth. Other than some scarring on his forehead and numbness in his chin, he said he suffered no visible disfigurement.
Savage sought to recover a medical lien of $100,000. He also sought damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The defense acknowledged Savage's injuries and treatment and maintained that Savage had made a full recovery.
The jury found Sharif 52% liable and Savage 48% liable. The jury determined that Savage's damages totaled $300,000, which was reduced to $156,000 to reflect the comparative-negligence finding.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs counsel. Defense counsel did not respond to calls for comment.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Morgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
- 2Litigating the Written Word: Parol Evidence Rule and the Gist of the Action Doctrine in Fraud Claims
- 3Why Wait? Arbitrate! The Value of Consenting to Arbitrate Your SUM Cases at NAM
- 4The Legal Status of Presidential Diaries Must Be Clarified
- 5Litigators of the Week: Shortly After Name Partner Kathleen Sullivan’s Retirement, Quinn Emanuel Scores Appellate Win for Vimeo
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250