As Revenue Grows Among Global 100, Two Pa. Firms Drop Off and One Breaks In
The world's largest firms turned in a second straight year of robust revenue gains amid near-universal progress.
September 24, 2019 at 05:30 AM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Last year saw spectacular revenue figures for the world's largest firms, with a handful of Pennsylvania firms among them.
Total revenue for the Global 100 increased a vigorous 8.1% over the past year, a step up from 2017's already robust 6.7% growth and a showing that dwarfs the 2.8% and 3.1% growth from the two preceding years. These firms brought in a collective $114.2 billion, more than the 2018 gross domestic product of Ecuador, the 60th largest economy in the world.
And among those Pennsylvania firms that made the list both this year and last year—Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Reed Smith, Dechert, K&L Gates, Fox Rothschild and Duane Morris—total revenue increased by 4.9%, from about $6 billion in 2017 to $6.3 billion in 2018.
However, each of those aforementioned Pennsylvania firms fell slightly in the rankings this year, with the exception of Fox Rothschild, which moved up to No. 92 from 95.
Meanwhile, two other Philadelphia-based firms, Blank Rome and Drinker Biddle & Reath, slipped off the Global 100 entirely this year, while Cozen O'Connor made the list for the first time, coming in at No. 100 with gross revenue of $473 million.
A total of 46 firms cracked the $1 billion mark this year, up from 34 firms two years ago. Among them were Morgan Lewis, Reed Smith, Dechert and K&L Gates. Of those 46 billion-dollar firms, all but nine have the bulk of their attorneys in the United States. Consequently, the American market continues to exert a heavy influence on the wider numbers. (The Am Law 100 posted 8% revenue growth in 2018.) Operating in an economy juiced by over $1 trillion in tax cuts, the U.S. giants reaped the benefits.
"In the U.S., the market was stunning," says Jomati Consultants principal Tony Williams, the former managing partner at Clifford Chance. "Even when you look at non-U.S. and non-China figures, it was mid-single digits overall. That's perfectly respectable."
Globally, most key practice areas were subject to brisk demand. The merger and acquisitions environment was active, albeit stronger in some markets than others. Disputes work, particularly international litigation and arbitration, kept practitioners busy. And an anticipated dip in investigations did not materialize, with sanctions, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and money laundering matters dotting the headlines.
Even the mild market correction at the end of 2018 had a muted impact.
"That did affect firms with a March or April year-end a bit more. But for U.S. firms, that's mostly done by the end of November," Williams says of how firms account for their results.
Other factors, beyond growing demand, also helped boost the numbers. Take mergers, for example. There were two significant mergers last year between U.S.-based firms and two significant trans-Atlantic mergers: Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough's combination with Broad and Cassel and Hunton & Williams' merger with Andrews Kurth Kenyon on the domestic side, and the creation of Womble Bond Dickinson and Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner internationally. Nelson Mullins and Womble Bond's moves pushed two smaller firms off this year's Global 100, and Hunton Andrews Kurth and Bryan Cave posted significantly higher revenues than their predecessors, which made the list last year. These changes helped account for a notable part of the overall revenue growth among this year's group.
Growth in China also played a role in making the 2018 numbers look particularly healthy.
Two large Chinese firms vaulted onto the Global 100 for the first time last year, and their presence, combined with significant China growth at Dentons, helped suppress the aggregate figure for revenue per lawyer, which actually declined 3.2% in 2017. That same metric rose by 2.7% in 2018. And it did so in part because of impressive growth at those two firms in particular. The Zhong Lun Law Firm, with 1,680 lawyers, almost doubled revenue per lawyer, from $264,000 to $508,000. Yingke, whose $82,000 RPL is much lower, still grew by nearly 37%. Along with China's AllBright Law Offices, a newcomer to the Global 100, those firms were in the top six in total revenue growth, with Yingke rising at an incredible 40%, AllBright growing 24.6% and Zhong Lun growing 18.7%.
In addition to Blank Rome and Drinker Biddle, two other firms dropped off the 2019 list: Chicago-based Jenner & Block and Australia's Allens, which burst onto the scene to rank 81st last year before bouncing out after just one year.
That left just one Australian firm, Ashurst, in the Global 100. Firms with more of their lawyers in the U.S. than any other jurisdiction held 77 of the spots, followed by the U.K., with 12. China's five firms include its three fast growers, as well as international players Dentons and King & Wood Mallesons, which The American Lawyer categorizes as Chinese firms. Canada placed four firms on this year's list, and South Korea is represented by Kim & Chang.
The very top of the Global 100, ranked by revenue, demonstrated remarkable stability in the past year. The largest eight firms were unchanged, and the only movement in the top 10 was in the ninth position, where Linklaters returned after a year out, displacing Hogan Lovells, which fell to 11th.
The biggest growth wasn't all found in China. While the country was home to three of the 10 fastest-growing firms on the list, the U.S. was home to six, led by Nelson Mullins' 27.5% jump and Foley & Lardner's 21.9% growth. The indomitable Kirkland & Ellis and Covington & Burling both exceeded 18% revenue growth, and Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith climbed 17.2%.
Meanwhile, only two firms on the list, Morrison & Foerster and Baker Botts, showed declining revenue—both of which were already reported in this year's Am Law 100.
If there's any cause for concern out of this year's figures, it's the fact that revenue per lawyer grew at a lower rate than the other key indicators—average profits per equity partner grew 4.6% to reach more than $1.7 million, for example. Meanwhile, wage and bonus costs are surging in a number of markets, not just the United States.
"There's some concern going forward that much of the increase in revenue was in increased head count rather than massively increased productivity," Williams says. "With costs up, you wouldn't need to have much of a dip to have an impact on the bottom line."
With whispers of a dreaded recession growing louder in recent months, thanks to political upheaval and uncertainty in London and Hong Kong, along with the burgeoning trade war between the U.S. and China, that's a good reminder for law firm leaders across the world. Get the house in order while the good times continue. It'll be easier to think carefully about what needs to be done now, rather than when the place is on fire.
Email: [email protected]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Approves $1.15M Settlement, Reduces Attorney Award in COVID-19 Tuition Reimbursement Suit
4 minute readPennsylvania Modernizes Trust Administration With New Directed Trust Statute
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 2Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 3In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 4Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 5Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250