Dressing in a 'Lawyerly' Way: 10 Reasons to Wear a Suit and Tie
Court appearances, depositions and other important meetings require appropriate business formal attire. But what about at other times? Many lawyers adopted "business casual" years ago.
September 27, 2019 at 01:42 PM
4 minute read
The movie, "My Cousin Vinny," ranks as one of my top five favorite lawyer movies. One of my favorite scenes is when Judge Chamberlain Haller, played by actor Fred Gwynne, leans down from the bench to upbraid Vinnie for wearing a black leather jacket in court, saying, "The next time you appear in my court, you will look lawyerly … wear a suit and tie. And that suit had better be made out of some sort of … cloth."
Court appearances, depositions and other important meetings require appropriate business formal attire. But what about at other times? Many lawyers adopted "business casual" years ago. However, here are 10 reasons you may want to bring back more formal attire that may be languishing in your closet.
- Dressing formally distinguishes you from the crowd.
How satisfying to be walking down the street and have a stranger say, "You look great. Nice suit!" Or bumping into opposing counsel and other members of the bar and always being prepared on a moment's notice to go to court or to tackle other business requiring more formality.
- Lawyers are experts in the law, and must also master the facts about their clients, their cases and their business deals.
Whether you favor suits all the time or mix in business casual, being dressed with an eye for detail projects a positive image.
- Dressing in a suit for the office separates work from home and play.
It's energizing to go home and change into more casual clothes for a jog, working out, walking the dog, etc. or just plain relaxation. But, it can get boring to wear the same casual clothes for work and play every day.
- Many people feel that they work better if they are more formally dressed, sitting up with good posture in their work space.
Try it and see if there is a difference.
- Wearing a suit to work helps promote physical fitness.
A good suit doesn't lie. If the jacket doesn't quite button like it used to, or the pants are getting short or tight around the waist, you know right away what's going on. The same can't be so easily said for slacks and a shirt, especially if it's one of those no-tuck-in models.
- Wearing a suit offers the opportunity to add good formal shirts, ties and other accessories that add zip to your appearance.
It also expands the list of nice things people can give you for your birthday and holidays.
- Suits offer many more pockets for wallets, pens, phones, keys, office passes, business cards, spare change and so forth than casual clothing.
- Local men's stores are having a tough time competing against e-tailers who sell a host of casual products.
Maintaining and adding new suits and office attire to your wardrobe will help smaller businesses and the local economy.
- Always be well groomed regardless of your choice of attire. The hirsute and unshaven look for men is popular among movie stars, athletes and celebrities, but look in the mirror. Is that a good look for you?
- Dressing for success may sound like a cliché, but there's a reason clichés exist.
When you choose to dress casually, consider adding a blazer or sport jacket to complement the slacks and long-sleeve shirt that you prefer. You will still be "casual, " but in a "lawyerly" manner that even Judge Haller would approve.
Robert Pratter, a member of Cohen, Placitella & Roth, heads up the firm's complex litigation group primarily representing public entities, union pension funds and private individuals in securities, antitrust environmental actions and other complex commercial litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Forgotten Ballot: Expanding Voting Access for Incarcerated Populations
5 minute readRemembering Am Law 100 Firm Founder and 'Force of Nature' Stephen Cozen
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250