Three Years After Conviction, Ex-Phila. Judge O'Neill's Law License Suspended
Former Philadelphia Municipal Court Judge Joseph O'Neill has been suspended from the practice of law, over three years after he was sentenced to probation for lying to the FBI agents investigating case-fixing.
October 01, 2019 at 06:23 PM
3 minute read
Former Philadelphia Municipal Court Judge Joseph O'Neill has been suspended from the practice of law, over three years after he was sentenced to probation for lying to the FBI agents investigating case-fixing.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday retroactively suspended O'Neill's law license for a period of five years, with the start date of Dec. 7, 2016. O'Neill was sentenced to four years' probation for lying to the FBI in September of that year.
The indictment alleged O'Neill received a call from former Municipal Court Judge Joseph C. Waters—who was convicted of case-fixing—asking him for favorable treatment of a small claims case involving Samuel Kuttab, who was one of Waters' political supporters.
O'Neill ultimately ruled in favor of Kuttab, and Kuttab later pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud in connection with his role in Waters' case-fixing scheme.
When interviewed by the FBI on Sept. 19, 2012, about the circumstances surrounding Waters and the Kuttab case, according to the indictment, O'Neill claimed he had not received any calls asking for a favor.
The following day, O'Neill left telephone messages with the FBI, and when an agent responded, O'Neill said that no one had asked him to "fix" the Kuttab case, and if they had, "he would want to punch him," the indictment said.
O'Neill and Municipal Court Judge Dawn Segal—who was also alleged to have received calls from Waters asking her to "take a hard look" at a particular case—were suspended from the bench in 2016 for their involvement with Waters, who pleaded guilty to related criminal charges and was sentenced in 2015 to two years in prison. Segal has not been criminally charged.
The Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board filed disciplinary charges against O'Neill and Segal in March 2015 for failing to timely report the ex parte communications with Waters.
Segal was tried in the Court of Judicial Discipline, but the disciplinary trial against O'Neill, which was scheduled to start in January 2015, was continued that month, as word began to spread that criminal charges against him were pending.
The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania recommended a five-year suspension of O'Neill's license this past August and the Supreme Court adopted that recommendation Tuesday.
It was not immediately clear Tuesday whether O'Neill was represented by counsel in his disciplinary matter.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChild Welfare Agency, Hotel Agree to $9.4M Settlement With Trafficking Victim
3 minute readFederal Judge Rejects Lyft's 'Competitive Harm' Claims in Attempt to Seal Safety Procedures, Storage Information
4 minute readPittsburgh's Rothman Gordon Set to Close at End of Month After 70 Years
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250