Pa. State Sen. Daylin Leach Sues Newspaper Alleging Reporter Was 'Colluding' With Sex Abuse Accuser
In the lawsuit, Leach accused reporter Angela Couloumbis of "colluding" with Cara Taylor to circulate a private criminal complaint that alleged Leach coerced her to perform oral sex on him in 1991 when he was defending her mother in a criminal case.
October 02, 2019 at 01:51 PM
4 minute read
Pennsylvania state Sen. Daylin Leach, D-Montgomery, who has been dogged by allegations of sexual misconduct, has sued The Philadelphia Inquirer and one of its reporters, contending that the publication defamed him with its coverage of the controversy around him and that the reporter was "colluding" with an accuser.
The lawsuit was filed Wednesday in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas by Lamb McErlane attorney Joseph Podraza. The lawsuit raises one count of defamation.
In the lawsuit, Leach accused reporter Angela Couloumbis of "colluding" with Cara Taylor to circulate a private criminal complaint that alleged Leach coerced her to perform oral sex on him in 1991 when he was defending her mother in a criminal case. At the time, Leach would have been 30 and Taylor would have been 17. Leach sued Taylor in January, alleging defamation.
In the lawsuit against the Inquirer, Leach said there were many inconsistencies and "impossibilities" in Taylor's story, which, to his knowledge, gave the newspaper pause about reporting it.
But, the senator said, Couloumbis "pressed" Taylor to present her claims to a governmental authority, and, after Taylor's unsigned criminal complaint was made public through an inquiry by Senate Democrats, the Inquirer reported on the allegations.
Leach, in his complaint Wednesday, said Taylor's lawsuit—which the Inquirer reported under the "fair report" privilege—was "a sham proceeding [the newspaper] and Taylor conspired to initiate." Leach also alleged that, in their coverage of Taylor's claims, the paper further failed to mention the inconsistencies in Taylor's story, or disclose Couloumbis' alleged involvement in helping make the complaint public.
"The purpose of the collaboration between Taylor and Couloumbis was undeniably to stage a governmental forum the defendants could exploit in order to publish false accusations against Senator Leach," Leach said in the 23-page complaint.
Leach practiced law for 17 years, focusing on criminal, constitutional and appellate litigation, according to his web biography. He was elected to the state House of Representatives in 2002 and Pennsylvania Senate six years later.
In an emailed statement, editor and vice president of The Inquirer, Gabriel Escobar, said, "We completely stand by our reporting and will not comment any further on this pending litigation."
The Inquirer reported in 2017 that Leach had previously engaged in inappropriate touching and sexualized talk with volunteers and staffers, and subsequently reported on the allegations outlined in Taylor's private criminal complaint. According to the lawsuit, in total, the paper published 43 articles rehashing the allegations against him.
Leach's lawsuit comes two weeks after an outside law firm retained by the Senate Democratic caucus to investigate the harassment allegations issued its report. The report by Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott said Leach had "engaged in joking and humor that was immature and unprofessional. At times, such jokes and humor were unquestionably sexual in nature," but ultimately found "no evidence of actionable discrimination or harassment in violation of applicable law or caucus policies."
Leach stated in his lawsuit against the Inquirer that the caucus report "debunk[ed]" Couloumbis' reporting, which, Leach said, "exaggerated and gratuitously sexualized otherwise benign interactions."
The lawsuit also said an article Couloumbis wrote in October 2017 discussing inappropriate and sexualized conduct in the state Capitol revealed the reporter had an "agenda" when she looked into claims about Leach's alleged conduct.
However, according to the complaint, Leach was unaware of Couloumbis' alleged proactive involvement in disseminating Taylor's allegations until discovery took place in a lawsuit filed by Leach against Taylor.
"Put simply, rather than reporting the news objectively, Couloumbis and the Inquirer helped stage the widespread dissemination of false information against Senator Leach to advance their own substantive biases, to increase the paper's sales and profits and, later, to cover their tracks," Leach said.
Couloumbis said the allegations aren't true.
Podraza declined to comment for this story.
READ THE COMPLAINT:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Denies DA Krasner's Bid to Stop Musk PAC's Million-Dollar Voter Giveaway
3 minute readKrasner Calls for Heightened Security for Upcoming Courtroom Fight Against Musk
2 minute readCampaign Finance Records Show Lawyers Have a Clear Favorite in Pa. Attorney General Race
4 minute readPhiladelphia District Attorney Alleges Elon Musk's Voter Sweepstakes Is an Illegal Lottery
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250