Pa. Surgeon Agrees to $4.25M Settlement Resolving Kickback Allegations
Allegations were first brought in under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act.
October 03, 2019 at 05:28 PM
4 minute read
A Pennsylvania surgeon has agreed to pay $4.25 million to resolve claims that he allegedly accepted a highly inflated salary and other payments as a kickback for referring clients to two hospitals in Lancaster.
According to Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti attorney Marc Raspanti, who represented the whistleblower in the qui tam action, the settlement resolves the bulk of a years-long litigation that last year resulted in a more than $260 million settlement with the Naples, Florida-based hospital chain Health Management Associates.
The settlement announced Thursday by the U.S. attorney of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania involved defendant Dr. Glenn Kline and his medical practice, Community Surgical Associates. As alleged in the lawsuit, Kline worked as a general surgeon in Lancaster between 2009 and 2012, and regularly referred clients to Lancaster Regional Medical Center and Heart of Lancaster Medical Center—both former HMA hospitals.
In announcing the settlement, federal prosecutors said Kline had "significant leverage" over HMA as it sought to compete in the Lancaster market, since he was a major source of surgical business in the area. To secure Kline's referrals, HMA paid him a salary of $1.2 million annually, the whistleblowers alleged. In their announcement, the feds said the salary was over 300% more than the Medical Group Management Association's median salary for comparable surgeons.
According to the allegations, HMA also made payments to Community Surgical Associates.
"Our resolution of this matter and the significant recovery we have obtained from this physician show once again that no matter how complex the fraud scheme is, we will find it, stop it, and punish it," First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jennifer Arbittier Williams said in announcing the settlement.
Allegations were first brought in under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act by George Miller and Michael Metts, former HMA executives in Lancaster. Metts and Miller are set to recover about $1.05 million for their role in the case.
Metts and Miller were represented by Raspanti and Pamela Coyle Brecht, who was lead in the Kline matter.
"We very much appreciate the confidence the government placed in our ability, their shared determination, and the true sense of teamwork that resulted from our participation in all aspects of the investigation and resolution of this claims," Brecht said in a statement from the firm.
Raspanti also said the settlement reflects a willingness of the Eastern District to investigate novel fraud claims.
"Patients need to trust in the independent medical judgment of their physicians and cannot be at the unchecked mercy of providers motivated by financial gain," Raspanti said.
The Kline settlement is the last piece of a nationwide False Claims Act litigation stemming from an alleged scheme orchestrated by HMA to fraudulently boost profits. That litigation had been brought by eight whistleblowers, from Florida, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Illinois, North Carolina and South Carolina. The hospital chain agreed to pay $262 million to resolve the False Claims Act whistleblower lawsuits In September 2018.
The Pennsylvania wing of that litigation included claims by Miller and Metts against HMA brought, which resulted in a $55 million piece of the $262 million settlement. The pair also brought claims against Physicians Alliance Limited, which settled in December 2017 for $4 million.
"The Miller/Metts case was unusual in that it really laid out the underbelly of how joint-venture and hospital relationships with physicians can go off the rails," Rapsanti said.
The settlement was reached after mediation before U.S. Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge.
Kline's attorney, Michael Salmanson of Salmanson Goldshaw, did not return a call seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Seek Redo of First Trial Over Medical Device Plant's Emissions
4 minute readHospital Must Provide Pre-Complaint Discovery in Privacy Breach Case, Pa. Judge Rules
4 minute readPhila. Anesthesiologist Wins Defense Verdict in Multimillion-Dollar Case Over C-Section Complications
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250