Psst … Your Bias Is Showing—a Response From YL Editorial Board
We chose to respond not because we're necessarily offended, but because we believe in challenging one another and promoting honest discussion.
October 03, 2019 at 04:32 PM
3 minute read
We as a board are constantly looking for ways to improve our industry. We devote a great deal of time to identifying issues facing our generation and contemplate ways in which we, as young lawyers, can create awareness and facilitate appropriate change. Once in a while, the "older guard" throws us a softball.
This week an article titled "Dressing in a Lawyerly Way: 10 Reasons to Wear a Suit and Tie" appeared in the Legal Intelligencer. The article offered advice to lawyers on how to dress like professionals and highlighted a few benefits of doing so. It was great reading—for the waiting room of a urologist's office. Not only does the title of the article equate looking lawyerly with work clothing traditionally worn by men, the article itself ignores female attire entirely! We're all for looking lawyerly, but since when is that synonymous with wearing a suit and tie?
The article goes on to question the judgment of those who choose not to shave (their faces) and encourages readers to patronize the local men's store. The author also points out the usefulness of a suit as an informal barometer of healthy living, contrasting it with the forgiving nature of slacks and an untucked shirt. The author was providing advice on "dressing lawyerly" and, whether he realized it or not, defaulting toward a traditional male audience.
Make no mistake—we're not suggesting that the article was written with any ill intent; quite the contrary, in fact. It's clear the article was written in good faith, and that the author wishes to impart upon his fellow barristers the advantages of professional attire. The problem lies not with his advice, but with his failure to recognize the limits of its application.
We get it—we're living in a time when it's difficult to say anything without offending someone, and we hope this response is not summarily discredited for that reason. The truth is we chose to respond not because we're necessarily offended, but because we believe in challenging one another and promoting honest discussion.
Sure, a suit and tie is a great look for some, but there are a lot more ways to look lawyerly.
The YL Editorial Board members: Leigh Ann Benson, Rachel Dichter, Scott Finger, Sarah Goodman, Kevin Harden, Jae Kim, Kandis Kovalsky, Bethany Nikitenko, Rob Stanko, chairman; Jeffrey Stanton, Shohin Vance and Meredith Wooters
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhether to Choose State or Federal Court in a Case Involving a Franchise?
5 minute readTrump RTO Mandates Won’t Disrupt Big Law Policies—But Client Expectations Might
6 minute readKirkland Lands in Phila., but Rate Pressure May Limit the High-Flying Firm's Growth Prospects
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Brought Under NYC Gender Violence Law, Ruling Claims Barred Under State Measure
- 24th Circuit Upholds Virginia Law Restricting Online Court Records Access
- 3Lawsuit Against Major Food Brands Could Be Sign of Emerging Litigation Over Processed Foods
- 4Fellows LaBriola LLP is Pleased to Announce that Alisha Goel Has Become Associated with The Firm
- 5Law Firms Turn to 'Golden Handcuffs' to Rein In Partner Movement
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250