Defense: Bicyclist Didn't Look Out, Caused Accident
On May 16, 2015, plaintiff Clarence Orbin, 74, a bus driver, was bicycling on River Avenue, near David McCullough Bridge, in Pittsburgh. Upon encountering a railroad spur, he fell off of the bicycle. He suffered injuries of a hip and his pelvis.
October 24, 2019 at 01:22 PM
5 minute read
Orbin v. The City of Pittsburgh
Defense Verdict
Date of Verdict: May 29.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Allegheny No. GD-16-008683.
Judge: John T. McVay Jr.
Type of Action: Premises liability.
Injuries: Hip fracture, pelvis injury.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Kevin R. Lomupo, Gilardi, Oliver & Lomupo, Pittsburgh.
Plaintiffs Expert: Gary S. Gruen, orthopedic surgery, Pittsburgh.
Defense Counsel: Matthew E. Orie, City of Pittsburgh Department of Law, Pittsburgh.
Defense Expert: Victor R. Prisk, orthopedic surgery; Monroeville.
Comment:
On May 16, 2015, plaintiff Clarence Orbin, 74, a bus driver, was bicycling on River Avenue, near David McCullough Bridge, in Pittsburgh. Upon encountering a railroad spur, he fell off of the bicycle. He suffered injuries of a hip and his pelvis.
Orbin sued the city of Pittsburgh and the adjoining premises' owner, Bay Valley Foods LLC. He alleged that the defendants negligently created a dangerous condition that caused the accident. Orbin settled with Bay Valley Foods for an undisclosed amount prior to trial. The case proceeded against the city.
According to Orbin, as he approached a railroad spur on the street, he came into contact with a raised rubber plate, one of several rubber plates that had been placed between and alongside the railroad tracks. Orbin claimed that the rubber plates raised in certain areas over time, likely because of inclement weather. Orbin's counsel asserted that the city negligently allowed the plates to remain in a dangerous and hazardous condition when it knew or should have known the plates constituted a hazard.
The defense maintained that the city had never received a complaint regarding the railroad spur at issue and, therefore, that the city could not be held liable. The defense contended that, since the city did not have notice of the alleged dangerous condition prior to the event, it was unable to have taken the measures necessary to prevent the accident.
The defense also asserted that Orbin was at fault. The defense cited Orbin's deposition testimony, in which he stated that he failed to see the railroad spur, which crosses the entirety of River Avenue, prior to impacting it. The defense said this was because he was looking to the right for an entrance of a nearby trail and that Orbin was not keeping a proper lookout for the conditions of the roadway. The defense further maintained that any liability should also be found against Bay Valley Foods, since it owned the property where Orbin fell and was responsible for maintaining it properly.
Orbin was taken by ambulance to a hospital and diagnosed with pelvis and hip fractures. He suffered a nondisplaced intra-articular left acetabulum fracture, with nondisplaced inferior and superior rami fractures of the pelvis. Orbin was fitted with a brace and discharged.
Through June 12, 2015, Orbin received in-home nursing care that included physical and occupational therapy. During that time, he relied on a wheelchair and a walker and consulted with an orthopedic surgeon. Orbin wore the brace for 10 weeks and continued to do home exercises and to follow up with his physician through August 2015.
Orbin claimed that, in the spring of 2018, he developed worsening lower back pain, which caused him to see a chiropractor for a month. He also consulted with his primary care physician, who prescribed pain medication. Orbin had undergone fusion of his spine's L4-5 level in 2013, and he claimed that the accident aggravated the pre-existing lumbar condition. No further treatment was administered.
Orbin's orthopedic surgeon opined that the accident caused Orbin to suffer arthritis in his left hip and an aggravation of his pre-existing back condition. The orthopedist stated that Orbin suffered permanent injuries to his hip and lower back.
Orbin testified that he experiences pain in his left hip and lower back almost daily. He claimed that this prevents him from running and from riding his bicycle. Orbin sought $25,511.46 in medical costs. He also sought to recover lost wages, having missed eight weeks of work at the rate of $80 a day. Orbin further sought damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The defense's expert in orthopedic surgery examined Orbin and testified that Orbin made a full recovery from his hip and pelvis fractures, without complication, residual deficits or disability. As for Orbin's alleged back pain, the expert attributed Orbin's complaints to his prior lumbar condition, which had been treated surgically.
The jury rendered a defense verdict. The jury found no liability on the party the city of Pittsburgh, Bay Valley Foods or Orbin.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs and defense counsel.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readSupreme Court's Ruling in 'Students for Fair Admissions' and Its Impact on DEI Initiatives in the Workplace
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Pusillanimous Press
- 2Contract Lifecycle Management Company ContractPodAi Unveils Leah Drive
- 3'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 4Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 5Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250