Jury Awards Plaintiff $2.1M in Paralyzing Auto Accident Injury
On June 29, 2015, plaintiff Donald Berger, 62, was driving east on Hulton Road, in Penn Hills Township. His minivan was involved in a head-on collision with a westbound car that was being driven by Caleb Wilson, who had crossed the roadway's center line. Berger suffered injuries of his back, his head and a leg.
October 24, 2019 at 03:02 PM
4 minute read
|
Berger v. Wilson
$2.1M Verdict
Date of Verdict: May 22.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Allegheny No. GD-17-007297.
Judge: Patrick M. Connelly.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Back, head and leg injuries.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Joshua P. Geist, Goodrich & Geist, Pittsburgh and Gary L. Ciao, Ciao, Torisky and O'Connor, Pittsburgh.
Plaintiffs Experts: Edward R. Westrick, orthopedic surgery; Pittsburgh; Varsha A. Desai, life care planning; Blue Bell; Charles J. Burke III, orthopedic surgery; Pittsburgh; Richard B. Kasdan, neurology, Pittsburgh; William M. DeMay, physical medicine; Johnstown.
Defense Counsel: Marc B. Zingarini and Elizabeth C. Grabey, McGivney, Kluger & Cook, Philadelphia.
Defense Experts: Kathleen Ryan Kuntz, life care planning, Jamison.
Comment:
On June 29, 2015, plaintiff Donald Berger, 62, was driving east on Hulton Road, in Penn Hills Township. His minivan was involved in a head-on collision with a westbound car that was being driven by Caleb Wilson, who had crossed the roadway's center line. Berger suffered injuries of his back, his head and a leg.
Berger sued Wilson. Berger alleged that Wilson was negligent in the operation of his vehicle. Defense counsel conceded liability. The trial addressed damages.
Berger was retrieved by an ambulance, and he was transported to a hospital. He was diagnosed with a comminuted distal fracture of the left femur, a nasal fracture, nasal lacerations, dislocation of the left index and ring fingers, fractures of ribs, a closed injury of his head, a fracture of each foot's great toe, and a fracture of the T5 vertebra, which resulted in paraplegia. Upon admission, an external fixator was placed on Berger's left thigh. Berger later underwent open reduction and internal fixation of his left femur's fracture, in which a plate and screws were implanted and bone grafting was performed. During his hospitalization, he suffered a heart attack and a pulmonary embolism, which required implantation of a blood-clot filter that was later removed in February 2017. After he was stabilized, Berger was transferred to a rehabilitation facility on an inpatient basis. He underwent extensive physical therapy. He suffered impairments in word fluency due to an injury to his frontal lobe.
Following his discharge, Berger suffered complications, including vascular problems with his legs, chronic venous stasis changes in both feet, and edema and ulcers of his toes. The skin breakdown of his toes requires daily wrapping, monitoring and care. He has also developed muscle spasticity and neurogenic bowel and bladder.
Berger's experts in physical medicine and life care planning outlined his future medical needs, which include medication, a total left-knee replacement, neuropsychological testing and treatment, handicap modifications, and medical monitoring.
Prior to the accident, Berger suffered from multiple sclerosis, which required him to use a wheelchair intermittently. He testified that, despite the condition, he was able to live an independent lifestyle. However, due to his injuries from the accident, which left him permanently wheelchair-bound, he requires near around-the-clock assistance for his activities of daily living, including dressing himself, bathing and using the bathroom. He sought to recover $2.3 million to $3.6 million in future medical costs, plus damages for past and future pain and suffering and disfigurement.
Berger's wife testified about his limitations and how she has become his caregiver. She discussed how the daily routine of wrapping and binding her husband's feet and toes, due to ongoing swelling and skin breakdown, is laborious and exhausting. She sought damages for loss of consortium.
The defense's expert orthopedist testified that Berger made a good recovery from his femur fracture and does not require a knee replacement. The defense's expert in life care planning testified that any future treatment related to Berger's injuries from the accident would be minimal. The expert stated that given Berger's multiple sclerosis, he would have eventually required assistance with his activities of daily living if the accident had not occurred.
The jury determined that the Bergers' damages totaled $2.1 million.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs counsel. Defense counsel did not respond to calls for comment.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250