Carpenter Receives $10M for Permanent Leg Injury in Settlement
A union carpenter who slipped on ice and sustained a permanent leg injury has reached a $10 million settlement with the companies he sued in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas.
October 28, 2019 at 04:36 PM
4 minute read
A union carpenter who slipped on ice and sustained a permanent leg injury has reached a $10 million settlement with the companies he sued in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas.
Plaintiff Mike Little, 43, working as a union carpenter as a member of Local 158 for a job managed by First State Mechanical, slipped on an icy patch caused by a broken water pipe, according to Little's attorney, Brian Fritz of Philadelphia firm Fritz & Bianculli.
According to the plaintiffs' court papers, Little, who fractured his ankle and sustained nerve injuries in his right leg, required five surgical procedures, multiple rounds of injections and now suffers from complex regional pain syndrome.
On Oct. 25, following mediation overseen by German, Gallagher & Murtagh partner Gary Gremminger, defendants Sulpizio Mechanical paid $1.95 million and First State Mechanical paid $8.05 million, according to Fritz, who said Little's supervisor was an admitted opioid abuser, and had abandoned the icy construction site to visit a food truck when Little was injured.
"This case and settlement involve a whole new group of victims of the opioid epidemic—those hurt on the job site as a result of someone else's addiction," Fritz said in a statement. "And, unfortunately, this may be the first reported settlement in such a case, but it will not be the last."
"This case is a wake-up call to all construction contractors," Fritz added. "The opioid epidemic is everywhere—including the construction site. Contractors have a responsibility to make sure they only employ safe and sober individuals. Not doing so presents a real risk of physical harm to the addict, as well as others on the jobsite, and today's settlement indicates the possible economic consequences that employer faces too."
First State's attorney, Brian Kane of Burns White, said the company did not admit liability.
"First State rejects any contention that its employees were utilizing drugs or otherwise impaired on the One Water Street project generally or at the time of the accident," Kane said. "The accident occurred as a result of the actions of a subcontractor of First State. The settlement was reached without an admission of liability on the part of First State."
John Livengood of Margolis Edelstein represents Sulpizio and declined to comment.
First State, in court papers opposing Little's request for punitive damages, said the plaintiff had no case.
"Plaintiffs cannot establish ordinary negligence, let alone establish the type of evil motive or reckless indifference required to permit a claim for punitive damages to proceed," First State said in court papers. "Plaintiffs rely solely upon their own affidavit, produced nearly two months after the close of fact discovery, for the assertion that Dan Battista had a drug problem while working on the One Water Street project, and that Dan Battista contributed to plaintiffs' injury by leaving the scene to purchase drugs. No deposition testimony or written discovery supports this assertion."
The defense argument continued, "Significantly, there is no evidence that First State knew of Dan Battista's alleged drug problem at the time of plaintiffs' injury, or that First State was aware that Dan Battista was allegedly purchasing drugs from the break truck at the One Water Street project. There is simply no facts on the record to support such a claim. Nothing in the record supports a finding that First State had a subjective appreciation for a risk of harm to plaintiff by allowing Dan Battista to work on the project."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Burr & Forman, Smith Gambrell & Russell Promote More to Partner This Year
- 2Sanctions Order Over Toyota's Failure to Provide English Translations of Documents Vacated by Appeals Court
- 3Roberts Calls Court's Relationship With Congress 'Strained.' Who's to Blame?
- 4Class Certification, Cash-Sweep Cases Among Securities Litigation Trends to Watch in 2025
- 5Buchanan Ingersoll Launches in Chicago With 17-Lawyer Team From Locke Lord
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250