Jury Sides With Defense in Comcast II Construction Accident
A worker who sued an electrical company after being injured by a piece of equipment during the construction of the second Comcast tower in Philadelphia has lost his case.
October 31, 2019 at 03:17 PM
4 minute read
Marcantonio v. JW Carrigan
Defense Verdict
Date of Verdict: Oct. 25.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Philadelphia No. 2018-002322.
Judge: Angelo Foglietta.Type of Action: Personal injury.
Injuries: Knee injury.
Plaintiffs Counsel: David Kwass, Saltz Mongeluzzi, Philadelphia.
Defense Counsel: Paul Leary, Cozen O'Conner, Philadelphia.
Comment:
A worker who sued an electrical company after being injured by a piece of equipment during the construction of the second Comcast tower in Philadelphia has lost his case.
The jury in Philadelphia Judge Angelo Foglietta's courtroom found unanimously in favor of defendants JW Carrigan and Kevin Lynch, the operator of the scissor lift that plaintiff Arthur Marcantonio claimed ran over his foot.
Paul Leary of Cozen O'Conner represented the defendants and David Kwass of Saltz Mongeluzzi Barret & Bendesky represented Marcantonio.
Leary said that his team was able to prevail because of "inconsistencies" in Marcantonio's lawsuit.
"It was a hotly contested trial that hinged on substantial disputes over liability, and numerous inconsistencies we exposed in plaintiff's case along with key social media impeachment evidence," Leary said in an email. "I enjoyed going up against plaintiff's counsel as we let each other try our case and Judge Foglietta facilitated that throughout the trial."
He continued, "Our clients have lived with this matter for a few years so it was great to see the expression of relief and vindication on their face when the jury found they were not negligent in operating the scissor lift."
Kwass said it was a tough case, but ultimately a fair fight.
"We are committed here to trying even tough cases and we are committed to protecting and forwarding the interest of men and women in the building trades," he said. "The defense was able to point out that Mr. Marcantonio, after the initial incident with the scissor lift, did not actually make any complaints after three weeks about his knee. I think that probably had a lot to do with why the jury was ultimately suspicious about the injury."
Kwass added, "what compounded the problem was that when Arthur did get treatment for the knee he neglected that he had a knee injury the prior year. Judge Foglietta called a fair fight, we had a chance to go to the jury but they had suspicions about the case … We respect the process."
Kwass said he does anticipate filing an appeal of the verdict.
The accident occurred Dec. 4, 2015. Marcantonio worked for general contracor, LF Driscoll. Lynch, a foreman for JW Carrigan, operated a scissor lift that Marcantonio alleged ran him over, ultimately resulting in ongoing treatment and a total knee replacement.
Marcantonio alleged an approximated loss of $1 million in wages, plus pain and suffering.
His complaint said that while no one saw him get run over by the lift, Marcantonio's two nearby coworkers responded to his cries for help.
"Though neither man actually witnessed the accident, both explained that their attention was drawn back to the location by Mr. Marantonio's cries," his pretrial memorandum said.
The defendants' court papers characterized the event as a "minor incident" and that Lynch exercised due caution.
"The unrefuted evidence demonstrates that Mr. Lynch was continuously checking in all directions in the moments leading up to the incident to ensure maneuver of the 3,000 pound scissor lift, which he was operating at less than .2 miles per hour while sounding its back-up beeper just before the incident occurred," the defendant's pretrial memorandum said.
—P.J. D'Annunzio, of the Law Weekly
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250