Wolf Administration Announces Plan to Join Northeast Carbon Market
On Oct. 3, Gov. Tom Wolf issued Executive Order 2019-07 signifying his intention for Pennsylvania to join the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI).
October 31, 2019 at 01:29 PM
8 minute read
On Oct. 3, Gov. Tom Wolf issued Executive Order 2019-07 signifying his intention for Pennsylvania to join the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). The order instructs the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection to "develop and present to the Pennsylvania Environmental Quality Board a proposed rulemaking package to abate, control or limit carbon dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel-fired electric power generators," by no later than July 31, 2020. The order directs the proposed rulemaking to be "sufficiently consistent with the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) model rule," such that allowances may be traded with holders of allowances from other RGGI states. Under the order, the DEP must also conduct a "robust public outreach process" ensuring the program results in reduced emissions, economic gains, and consumer savings, and must consult with PJM, the regional transmission organization that coordinates the movement of wholesale electricity within Pennsylvania and 12 other states, to promote the integration of the program.
|What Is RGGI?
RGGI is the country's first regional, market-based cap and trade program designed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. The program was created through a memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed by the governors of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York and Vermont on Dec. 20, 2005. The MOU committed the signatory states to propose a carbon dioxide budget trading program for legislative and regulatory approval, by setting the initial base annual emissions cap for each state and providing that each state's annual allocation would decline by 2.5% each year after 2015.
The MOU also provided for the creation of the regional organization, which has an executive board comprised of two members from each signatory state that serves as a forum for collective deliberation, emissions and allowance tracking, and technical support for determining offsets. The regional organization is funded, at least in part, through payments from each signatory state. The MOU also provides for periodic monitoring and review of the program facilitated by the regional organization.
RGGI currently has nine state members: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont. New Jersey, an original participant when the program started in 2005, withdrew from the program in 2011 but is in the process of rejoining. Virginia has also taken steps toward joining RGGI but the current state budget prohibits the state from joining the program this year.
Under RGGI, fossil-fuel-fired electric power generators with a capacity of 25 megawatts or greater (regulated sources) are required to hold allowances equal to their carbon dioxide emissions over a three-year compliance period. Each allowance is equal to one short ton of carbon dioxide. Regulated sources must purchase carbon dioxide allowances issued by a RGGI state in order to comply. Regulated sources may also use offsets, allowances awarded to certain acceptable environmental projects, to meet a maximum of 3.3% of its allowances.
The proceeds from the allowance auctions are allocated back to the participating states in proportion to the amount of carbon subject to regulation in each state.
|Legal Authority to Join in Pennsylvania
To date, all RGGI states except New York have enacted both authorizing statutes and regulations to join and implement RGGI. In Pennsylvania, Wolf may have the authority to negotiate with the RGGI states and sign an amendment to the RGGI MOU, but like other RGGI states, a statute and regulation is likely required to bind the commonwealth to a cap and trade program.
RGGI would not be Pennsylvania's first cap and trade program. Like many states, Pennsylvania instituted a cap and trade program in the early 2000s in response to federal requirements under the Clean Air Act to regulate nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide. However, since RGGI was not created in response to a specific federal requirement, instituting a cap and trade program for carbon dioxide and participating in RGGI would likely require express legislative authorization.
|RGGI Member Requirements
The MOU does not outline specific procedures for how new states can join RGGI. In the past, however, new signatory states have been added through amendment to the MOU. Section 8 of the MOU provides for general amendments, which must be in writing and have the collective agreement of the authorized representatives of the signatory states. The Second Amendment to the MOU added Maryland as a signatory state, set its initial base carbon dioxide emissions budget, and increased the regional emissions budget to include the new Maryland base budget.
The current RGGI participating states offer a "potential path forward" to RGGI participation in the new state participation in RGGI guidance document, available on RGGI's website. The guidance suggests that interested states start the process by initiating communication with current RGGI states. Initial discussions should include program compatibility, timing of new state participation, and stringency of the new state's proposed program. One critical aspect of these discussions is the development of the proposed carbon dioxide allowance budget for the incoming state. According to Maryland's RGGI coordinator, initial state allowance caps are determined by looking at historic emissions from power generators over 25 megawatts and using the integrated planning model (an model platform developed by the International Climate Foundation and used by both USEPA and FERC to evaluate utility air emissions and cost-benefits for regional transmission organizations) to analyze the projected impact of a state's entrance into RGGI on the price of allowances across all RGGI states. Pennsylvania's initial allowance would be the largest of any current RGGI participant, as Pennsylvania is the only major fossil fuel producing state to consider joining. In 2017 Pennsylvania's power sector emitted 76.8 million metric tons of carbon dioxide, compared to regional RGGI cap for all member states in the same year of 84.3 metric tons.
The guidance includes nine other steps, including the identification of legislation and executive action needed to authorize participation, establishing a carbon dioxide budget trading program and an auctioning procedure for carbon dioxide allowances using the RGGI model rule as a template, and completing the necessary state rulemaking process. Other steps include signing a contract with RGGI, Inc., a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation created to provide administrative and technical support to the development and implementation of each RGGI state's carbon dioxide budget trading program.
To become an official participating state under RGGI's bylaws, the RGGI board of directors will enter into a service contract with the participating state under which RGGI, Inc. will provide technical and scientific advisory services to the participating state. In Pennsylvania, the governor or DEP would likely sign the contract, with approval by the attorney general, depending on the authority granted in the implementing legislation.
|Other Considerations
If Pennsylvania joins RGGI, one important question is how RGGI revenue generated by the carbon dioxide allowance auctions will be spent in the commonwealth. The MOU requires each signatory state to allocate 25% of its allowances to consumer benefit or strategic energy purpose, which includes measures promoting energy efficiency, directly mitigating electricity ratepayer impacts, promoting renewable or non-carbon emitting technologies or funding the administration of the program itself. Other than a provision in the 2017 model rule stating that the regional organization must be funded, at least in part, by the signatory states, nothing in the MOU or model rule specifically restricts how additional RGGI revenue can be spent.
There is also another cap and trade initiative pending in Pennsylvania resulting from a petition for rulemaking submitted by a group of non-profit organizations and individuals in November 2018. On April 16, the Pennsylvania Environmental Quality Board voted 14-5 in favor of directing the DEP to develop a report and recommendation on the cap and trade petition. The petition borrows heavy from the California cap and trade program and is far broader than RGGI cap and trade programs, covering multiple sectors of the economy, not just electricity generators. On June 18, the DEP reported to the EQB that it expects to present an outside consultant's evaluation of the cost and benefits of the petition in early 2020.
The impact of joining RGGI in Pennsylvania is unclear but is certain to affect pricing for residential and commercial consumers. The effect on future greenhouse gas emissions is also unclear because Pennsylvania emissions of greenhouse gases have already declined from 324 million metric tons in 2000 to 286 million metric tons in 2015.
Kevin Garber is a shareholder in the environmental services and energy and natural resources groups of Babst, Calland, Clements & Zomnir, practicing out of the firm's Pittsburgh and State College offices. Contact him at [email protected].
Hannah L. Baldwin is an associate in the environmental and energy and natural resources groups of the firm. She assists clients in a variety of industrial sectors with a broad range of environmental matters, including issues related to federal and state permitting and regulatory compliance. Contact her at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Seek Redo of First Trial Over Medical Device Plant's Emissions
4 minute read'Serious Misconduct' From Monsanto Lawyer Prompts Mistrial in Chicago Roundup Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 2Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 3Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 4Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
- 5In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250