A federal appeals court has reversed the dismissal of a pro se lawsuit filed by a woman with ADHD and dyslexia against the Law School Admission Council for denying her accommodations for LSAT testing.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit overturned U.S. District Judge Nitza I. Quinones Alejandro of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the LSAC, based on the judge’s ruling that plaintiff Jane Doe did not prove a concrete injury under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]