In Phila. Market, Law Firms Seek Amenities Over Space
When it comes to real estate, a new CBRE report finds that big law firms in Philadelphia are finding ways to balance cost with premium tastes.
November 04, 2019 at 04:59 PM
4 minute read
Premium perks have become more important than square footage when choosing law firm office space in Philadelphia, a recent report on law firm real estate trends suggests.
In "A Shifting Landscape: 2019 North American Legal Sector Trends," real estate services provider CBRE broke down the recent trends for a number of legal markets across the United States. In Philadelphia, it said, large law firms are looking to incorporate "new workplace strategies" when building out their space. And they want long-term leases in "Class A space with high-quality amenities."
Tony Rossi of CBRE said those amenities include concierge service, meeting space and "touchdown" space—places where co-workers can meet informally and collaborate.
"Law firms have a critical eye toward real estate costs and doing whatever they can to reduce them," Rossi said. But at the same time, "They want to be in a best-of-the-best building."
The trade-off comes in more efficient use of space. Rossi said firms are more frequently opening up to the idea of single-size offices, rather than office sizes based on hierarchy. And as they cut square footage, they're making spaces feel more open by opting for glass walls. These changes have allowed law firms to cut square footage by about 20%, he said.
From the third quarter of 2018 through the second quarter of 2019, the study said, law firms have been involved in 512,171-square-feet worth of transactions for their own office space in Philadelphia.
The report said 34.9% of firms in Philadelphia have expanded their space, 24.2% have contracted and 35.4% were stable. Meanwhile, 5.4% of law firm offices were new to the market.
Among those that shrank their space, the average contraction was 26.5%.
According to the report, "firms located in older un-renovated spaces [are] consider[ing] downsizing in new high-quality space amid rising construction costs."
Rossi said law firms have historically used 800 to 1,000 square feet per attorney, and now they've gotten down to 550 to 750 square feet per attorney. The most aggressive firms in this regard will move toward 450 to 600 square feet per attorney in coming years, he said.
The biggest Philadelphia law firm real estate transaction from third-quarter 2018 through second-quarter 2019 was completed by Post & Schell, which renewed its space, but contracted some, leasing 68,738 square feet.
Following behind was DLA Piper, which renewed 50,000 square feet; Holland & Knight, which expanded to 41,571 square feet; Zarwin Baum DeVito Kaplan Schaer Toddy, which expanded to 29,719 square feet; and Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellot, which renewed and contracted its space in central Pennsylvania, to 29,417 feet, according to CBRE.
CBRE also pointed out some demographic trends regarding Philadelphia's lawyer population. The Philadelphia legal services industry employs 39,224 people, giving it a concentration of 1.3%, greater than the national average of 0.8%, the report said.
A closer look at the numbers suggests that in Philadelphia, legal industry employees who are not lawyers may be growing in number, while the number of lawyers is shrinking.
While that population was just above flat, growing by 0.6% in Philadelphia and 1.6% nationally from 2016 to 2018, it is projected to shrink. According to CBRE, from 2018 to 2023 legal services employment is expected to decrease by 4.6% in Philadelphia, and by 5.5% nationally.
Already, the lawyer population has contracted in Philadelphia. According to the report, there were 18,280 lawyers in Philadelphia, representing a decline of 4.1% in the lawyer population from 2016 to 2018. That contrasts with growth of 3% nationally.
The average lawyer wage in Philadelphia was $152,100, versus a national average of $141,890. The average paralegal wage was $55,740, compared to a national average of $53,910.
Asked what the observed real estate trends say about Philadelphia law firms going forward, particularly heading into a potential economic downturn, Rossi said they'll be well-prepared, as acceptance of single-size offices and downsizing generally increases.
"When the recession comes, they'll be better prepared, and you'll see design for density be more accepted by attorneys," Rossi said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDe-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 2
Embracing a ‘Stronger Together’ Mentality: Collaboration Best Practices for Attorneys
6 minute readUS Supreme Court Considers Further Narrowing of Federal Fraud Statutes
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Knowledge of Mismatch:' Fed Judge Offers Guidance on How to Hold Banks Accountable for Erroneous Transfers
- 2PAGA Claims Must Now Be 'Headed'
- 3Million-Dollar Verdict: Broward Jury Sides With Small Business
- 4'Reluctant to Trust'?: NY Courts Continue to Grapple With Complexities of Jury Diversity
- 5'Careless Execution' of Presidential Pardons Freed Convicted Sex Trafficker, US Judge Laments
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250