'Penn Law' Keeps Its Name—For Now
Under pressure from unhappy students and alumni, the University of Pennsylvania Carey School of Law on Monday announced a return to the "Penn Law" nickname, but only until 2022.
November 18, 2019 at 03:44 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
"Penn Law" is back. Sort of.
The University of Pennsylvania Carey School of Law will continue to be known, informally, as Penn Law until the start of the 2022 academic year, Dean Ted Ruger informed students and alumni Monday. After that, the school's official shorthand will be "Penn Carey Law."
The announcement follows more than a week of pressure from students and alumni unhappy about the switch to the official shorthand of "Carey Law"—a result of a $125 million donation from the W.P. Carey Foundation, which was announced Nov. 8 and which sparked a formal rebranding of the school. That donation and the subsequent move to "Carey Law" has prompted both positive and critical reactions, Ruger wrote, but also some concern over the school's future.
"Much of the conversation has centered on concerns over the short-form name, instead of a focus on how the Carey Foundation gift will be used," reads Ruger's message to the law school community. "We have heard you. Like all of you, my colleagues and I care deeply about the Law School's history, tradition, and reputation in the academy, profession, and across the globe."
The compromise will allow all current students to graduate while "Penn Law" is still in use as the school's formal shorthand. But the short form of "Penn Carey Law" will be in use by the time next fall's entering class is in its third year.
It remains to be seen whether the compromise will appease those angry about the move toward "Carey." Kristen DeWilde, a Penn law student who has been organizing students and alumni in support of a return to "Penn Law" called Monday's decision a "bittersweet victory." The law school's communication with those who oppose the "Carey Law" shortform was lacking, she said.
"Yes, the Penn Law administration heard the petition and the countless emails and calls delivered to them, but they did not communicate with students and alumni for ten days about what was happening despite repeated requests in a variety of forums for more information not only about the name change but also about the agreement, the money, and it's intended purposes," DeWilde wrote in an email. "Students and alumni are important stakeholders and should be treated as such. This means not only hearing us, but also communicating with us."
Backlash against the previously planned "Carey Law" nickname was swift. Within days of the name change announcement, more than 1,000 students and alumni had signed a petition calling for a return to "Penn Law." That name carries both tradition and the name recognition that "Carey Law" lacks, the petition argued. Additionally, the Carey moniker is already in use within legal education. The W.P. Carey Foundation gave $30 million to the University of Maryland's law school and it became the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law in 2012.
"I am extremely disappointed in both the outcome and the process," said Penn Law alum and Pepper Hamilton partner M. Kelly Tillery after the new shorthand was announced. "The latter is an awful 'compromise' and the former insulting to the various constituencies such as students, alumni, faculty, etc."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSanctioned Penn Law Professor Amy Wax Sues University, Alleging Discrimination
5 minute readPa. Superior Court: Sorority's Interview Notes Not Shielded From Discovery in Lawsuit Over Student's Death
3 minute readLSAT Administrator Sues to Block AI Tutor From Using ‘Famous, Distinctive’ Test Prep Materials
3 minute readDisjunctive 'Severe or Pervasive' Standard Applies to Discrimination Claims Against University, Judge Rules
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250