The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has declined to weigh in on a Superior Court ruling that said a Jehovah’s Witness’ repeated written and verbal refusal to allow doctors to perform a blood transfusion prior to her death prevents her estate from proceeding with a medical malpractice lawsuit.

In July 2017, a unanimous three-judge panel ruled in Seels v. Tenet Health System Hahnemann that the trial court made no errors in its denial of post-trial motions following a jury finding that Terri Seels-Davila’s death was not caused by the negligence of her medical providers.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]