White and Williams, Denying Lawyer's Discrimination Claims, Rejected Settlement Demand
White and Williams has argued that the lawyer "has been neither discriminated against nor harassed during her tenure," and that a third-party investigator found the same.
December 02, 2019 at 05:54 PM
4 minute read
Philadelphia's skyline. Photo: Shutterstock.com
White and Williams continues to deny an African American lawyer's claims that she was "marginalized, mocked, deprived of opportunities to develop her career and otherwise discriminated against and harassed" because of her race.
Linda Perkins, who is still listed as counsel on the law firm's website, alleged earlier this year that White and Williams is "a homogenous, almost exclusively white, male-dominated law firm." She alleged that the firm responded to her complaints of harassment "by shunning her and shutting her out of almost all meaningful work and professional opportunities."
A report filed Nov. 27 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania shed light on developments in the case since Perkins filed her complaint in May, as well as the firm's internal inquiry surrounding her claims.
White and Williams has argued that the lawyer "has been neither discriminated against nor harassed during her tenure" with the firm, and contended that she failed to bill half of the annual hours specified in her employment agreement during her first year with the firm.
According to the firm, Tracy Armstrong, a shareholder at Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, conducted an investigation into Perkins' claims when she first brought them to the firm, and is expected to testify in discovery. The firm said following Armstrong's investigation, it concluded that Perkins "had not been harassed on any level."
According to the report, the parties engaged in settlement discussions shortly before Perkins filed her complaint, and Perkins "made a settlement demand after which defendant determined that further settlement discussion would be unproductive."
Before joining White and Williams, Perkins was a partner in the Philadelphia office of New Jersey-based law firm Archer. Prior to that she was a department chief in the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office.
Perkins is represented by employment lawyer Jennifer Bell of Bell & Bell in Philadelphia. Bell, reached by phone Monday, declined to comment on the case.
White and Williams has turned to Sidney Steinberg and Fara Cohen of Post & Schell. A spokeswoman for White and Williams did not respond to a request for comment Monday.
According to her complaint, Perkins was hired in February 2017, and her employment agreement specified that if she billed 1,200 hours in 2017 and 1,400 hours in 2018, she would be signed on to work there through 2019. Her annual base salary was $230,000, the complaint said.
"Shortly after joining the firm, it became clear to Ms. Perkins that she was not being assigned enough work to allow her to meet her annual billable hours requirement, to meet expectations of a lawyer of her capabilities, or to permit her to cultivate a book of business and develop professionally," she alleged.
Perkins was not allowed to attend client meetings and events where she had preexisting contacts with the client, and she was excluded from panels she was qualified for, she alleged. She also drafted scholarly articles that were delayed or ignored, the complaint said. At the same time, Perkins alleged, her white male colleagues had access to these opportunities that she was being denied.
Perkins asserts that she raised her concerns about her ability "to grow professionally" during a July 2018 meeting with the commercial litigation department chair, but her complaints "were not taken seriously."
In addition to her allegations specific to her own career, Perkins said she overheard comments at the firm that support her allegations of discrimination.
For instance, she said she "overheard a number of attorneys comment on the extensive time period that African American attorneys spend as associates at White and Williams before (rarely) being elevated to higher-level positions," and "heard at least one other attorney at the firm openly acknowledge during a Women's Initiative event at DiBruno Brothers that 'the only way to make partner here is if you have a penis,'" the complaint said.
After filing her initial complaint, the latest report said, Perkins filed a charge of gender and disability discrimination with the EEOC. The report noted that Perkins was granted 12 weeks of leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act after Armstrong's investigation concluded, related to emotional distress. The firm said she was found to be ineligible for short-term disability benefits by a third-party administrator, but that White and Williams had no role in that determination.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Visa Revocation and Removal: Can the New Administration Remove Foreign Nationals for Past Advocacy? Visa Revocation and Removal: Can the New Administration Remove Foreign Nationals for Past Advocacy?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/8f/0d/9830864b4091be74cb5ce64e2fce/nick-lowrey-767x633.jpg)
Visa Revocation and Removal: Can the New Administration Remove Foreign Nationals for Past Advocacy?
6 minute read![Is the Collateral Order Doctrine About to Have a 'Brat Summer'? Is the Collateral Order Doctrine About to Have a 'Brat Summer'?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/b2/98/e11e515a4931970d1eb966456393/casey-alan-coyle-767x633-1.jpg)
![Feasting, Pledging, and Wagering, Philly Attorneys Prepare for Super Bowl Feasting, Pledging, and Wagering, Philly Attorneys Prepare for Super Bowl](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/d4/c0/a6fa9c04473f8fa9491f7e9e6e20/polsinelli-philly-team-767x633.jpg)
Feasting, Pledging, and Wagering, Philly Attorneys Prepare for Super Bowl
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Exceptional Growth Becoming the Rule? Demand and Rate Hikes Drove Strong Year for Big Law
- 2Dentons Taps D.C. Capital Markets Attorney for New US Managing Partner
- 3Auto Dealers Ask Court to Pump the Brakes on Scout Motors’ Florida Sales
- 4German Court Orders X to Release Data Amid Election Interference Concerns
- 5Litigation Trends to Watch From Law.com Radar: Suits Strike at DEI Policies, 'Meme Coins' and Infractions in Cannabis Labeling
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.