Despite Earlier Collections Efforts, Pa. Firms Feel Clients' Payment Delays
While billing and client relations have changed at many firms, December is still crunch time for bringing in revenue.
December 09, 2019 at 03:51 PM
4 minute read
Despite a recent report that Pennsylvania-based law firms have seen collections cycles shorten, several large law firm leaders in the region say they have not been immune to the industrywide lag in client payments.
A survey covering the first three quarters of 2019, released last month by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group, said the collections cycle continued to lengthen nationally—by 1.5% in the first nine months—but Pennsylvania firms saw the collections cycle shorten by 4.6% in the same period.
The survey included 13 firms founded in Pennsylvania, though further information on the size of those firms and timing of their fiscal years is not included in the report. (Several Am Law 100 firms based in Pennsylvania do not end their fiscal years Dec. 31.)
Pennsylvania firm leaders say they're making an effort to collect all throughout the year. But that doesn't keep clients from delaying payments to fit their own financial strategies, and it hasn't allowed them to fully escape the December collections crunch.
Matt Taylor, CEO of Duane Morris, said he and other Philadelphia law firm leaders have been discussing what they perceive as a slowdown on the client side in paying legal bills. Joseph Dougherty, the Philadelphia-based CEO of Pittsburgh-headquartered Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, said he, too, has noticed a longer collections cycle across the board.
"There was a little bit of a different feel this year," Taylor said. "Thankfully we sensed that early on and we've got such a good collections group. Working with our lawyers we spotted it and got on it."
Taylor estimated that his firm collects about 15% of its annual revenue in December each year.
"It's actually gone down over the years, where it's less and less," he noted, crediting clients' insistence on more sophisticated budgeting, both in their own legal departments and by their outside counsel.
Cozen O'Connor CEO Michael Heller said his firm historically has needed to collect about 17% of its revenue, on average, in the last month of the year. He said that seems to be below the industry average.
"Some firms have taken the stick approach to accelerating collections throughout the year, [but] we've always taken the carrot approach," Heller said, referring to how the firm rewards accelerated collections. "We also track the collections cycles of our attorneys and reward those who are collecting more evenly throughout the year as opposed to in the last month of the year."
Heller said he is "cautiously optimistic" that 2019 will turn out to be a "terrific" year for the firm.
Dougherty said December remains "a really important collections month" for Buchanan Ingersoll. He declined to quantify how much revenue is collected in the last month of the year, but he said it's "substantial."
He said the firm has "a significant amount" of accounts receivable, but that's more a reflection of its lawyers' busy year. The firm has been striving to improve its collections cycle over the years, he added.
"We every year have an internal effort where we have a team of lawyers that we task with staying in touch with other lawyers and their collections. We started that earlier this year, in November," Dougherty said. "I've really been impressing on people that it's really important to get in touch early instead of waiting until mid-December and hoping they're there."
Mark Stewart, chair of Ballard Spahr, said on the client side, e-billing alone has created a more predictable collections cycle. And, he noted, his firm has been more disciplined about collecting in the first three quarters.
"Your ability to affect things by the fourth quarter is diminishing. With electronic billing you submit them and it's all done electronically," he said. "In some ways it's not quite as hectic as it was, but still a substantial amount of revenue comes in," just before year-end.
Stewart estimated that at least 25% of the firm's revenue is collected in December. Still, he also noted that clients are oftentimes on a set payment schedule of 30, 60 or even 75 days.
"We could be doing everything absolutely right … and if [the bill] goes out let's say November 10, and if the client is on a 60-day pay, we won't see it until January," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhether to Choose State or Federal Court in a Case Involving a Franchise?
5 minute readKirkland Lands in Phila., but Rate Pressure May Limit the High-Flying Firm's Growth Prospects
5 minute readThe Intersection of Labor Law and Politics Following the Presidential Election
8 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250