Despite Earlier Collections Efforts, Pa. Firms Feel Clients' Payment Delays
While billing and client relations have changed at many firms, December is still crunch time for bringing in revenue.
December 09, 2019 at 03:51 PM
4 minute read
Despite a recent report that Pennsylvania-based law firms have seen collections cycles shorten, several large law firm leaders in the region say they have not been immune to the industrywide lag in client payments.
A survey covering the first three quarters of 2019, released last month by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group, said the collections cycle continued to lengthen nationally—by 1.5% in the first nine months—but Pennsylvania firms saw the collections cycle shorten by 4.6% in the same period.
The survey included 13 firms founded in Pennsylvania, though further information on the size of those firms and timing of their fiscal years is not included in the report. (Several Am Law 100 firms based in Pennsylvania do not end their fiscal years Dec. 31.)
Pennsylvania firm leaders say they're making an effort to collect all throughout the year. But that doesn't keep clients from delaying payments to fit their own financial strategies, and it hasn't allowed them to fully escape the December collections crunch.
Matt Taylor, CEO of Duane Morris, said he and other Philadelphia law firm leaders have been discussing what they perceive as a slowdown on the client side in paying legal bills. Joseph Dougherty, the Philadelphia-based CEO of Pittsburgh-headquartered Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, said he, too, has noticed a longer collections cycle across the board.
"There was a little bit of a different feel this year," Taylor said. "Thankfully we sensed that early on and we've got such a good collections group. Working with our lawyers we spotted it and got on it."
Taylor estimated that his firm collects about 15% of its annual revenue in December each year.
"It's actually gone down over the years, where it's less and less," he noted, crediting clients' insistence on more sophisticated budgeting, both in their own legal departments and by their outside counsel.
Cozen O'Connor CEO Michael Heller said his firm historically has needed to collect about 17% of its revenue, on average, in the last month of the year. He said that seems to be below the industry average.
"Some firms have taken the stick approach to accelerating collections throughout the year, [but] we've always taken the carrot approach," Heller said, referring to how the firm rewards accelerated collections. "We also track the collections cycles of our attorneys and reward those who are collecting more evenly throughout the year as opposed to in the last month of the year."
Heller said he is "cautiously optimistic" that 2019 will turn out to be a "terrific" year for the firm.
Dougherty said December remains "a really important collections month" for Buchanan Ingersoll. He declined to quantify how much revenue is collected in the last month of the year, but he said it's "substantial."
He said the firm has "a significant amount" of accounts receivable, but that's more a reflection of its lawyers' busy year. The firm has been striving to improve its collections cycle over the years, he added.
"We every year have an internal effort where we have a team of lawyers that we task with staying in touch with other lawyers and their collections. We started that earlier this year, in November," Dougherty said. "I've really been impressing on people that it's really important to get in touch early instead of waiting until mid-December and hoping they're there."
Mark Stewart, chair of Ballard Spahr, said on the client side, e-billing alone has created a more predictable collections cycle. And, he noted, his firm has been more disciplined about collecting in the first three quarters.
"Your ability to affect things by the fourth quarter is diminishing. With electronic billing you submit them and it's all done electronically," he said. "In some ways it's not quite as hectic as it was, but still a substantial amount of revenue comes in," just before year-end.
Stewart estimated that at least 25% of the firm's revenue is collected in December. Still, he also noted that clients are oftentimes on a set payment schedule of 30, 60 or even 75 days.
"We could be doing everything absolutely right … and if [the bill] goes out let's say November 10, and if the client is on a 60-day pay, we won't see it until January," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Testamentary Exception Does Not Permit a Decedent to Impliedly Waive a Survivor’s Attorney-Client Privilege
6 minute readMatt's Corner: Contributory Negligence Can Be a Bar to Legal Malpractice Recovery
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Pusillanimous Press
- 2Contract Lifecycle Management Company ContractPodAi Unveils Leah Drive
- 3'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 4Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 5Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250