Lehigh Jury Hits Doctor, Hospital With $6.3M Verdict Over Misdiagnosed Heart Condition
A cardiologist employed by St. Luke's University Health Network improperly diagnosed 48-year-old James Cowher as suffering from anxiety and panic attacks, rather than from a heart condition, when he was treated for chest pains, according to the complaint. He died of a fatal heart attack several days later while running.
December 10, 2019 at 05:32 PM
5 minute read
A Lehigh County jury has awarded nearly $6 million to the widow of a man who died of a heart attack after his chest pain was allegedly improperly diagnosed as the result of panic attacks.
The jury in Cowher v. Kodali handed up the verdict Monday after more than a week of trial before Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas Judge J. Brian Johnson. The verdict included $2,457,000 in wrongful death and $3,833,000 in survival damages, for a total of $6.29 million, according to the court.
According to court papers, the case stemmed from allegations that Dr. Sobhan Kodali, a cardiologist employed by St. Luke's University Health Network, improperly diagnosed 48-year-old James Cowher as suffering from anxiety and panic attacks, rather than from a heart condition, when he was treated for chest pains. He died of a fatal heart attack several days later while running.
Cowher's attorney, Andrew Youman of Youman & Caputo, who represented Cowher's widow, Karen Cowher, said in a statement that the "tragedy was entirely avoidable."
"Jim Cowher knew he had a family history of heart disease, recognized the warning signs and went to his doctor. He did everything he was supposed to do," Youman said. "His cardiologist did not pay enough attention to the details and missed his symptoms as non-cardiac. That error cost Jim his life. We are gratified the jury saw the truth and reached the correct result."
Laurie Shannon of Kilcoyne & Nesbitt was defense counsel.
Sam Kennedy, a spokesman for St. Luke's University Health Network, said in an emailed statement, "After hearing testimony from a nationally renowned expert from Penn State Medical Center, who agreed that St. Luke's provided the best possible care to the patient, it is disappointing that the jury reached a different conclusion and awarded a shockingly high sum."
"While we respect the decision of the jury, tort reform is very much needed in this country so that awards are within the realm of reasonableness," he said.
According to the plaintiffs' pretrial memo, in September 2015, James Cowher had a single episode of chest pain for which he underwent a stress test that was interpreted by Kodali as negative. Ten months later, Cowher went again to his primary care physician, reporting recurring shortness of breath, nausea and chest pain that radiated down both his arms. The memo said he noted that the episodes were more frequent and severe than previous chest pain he had suffered.
The memo said Cowher's primary doctor noted that the complaints from the 2016 visit were different than those he reported in the 2015 episode, and referred Cowher to Kodali. However, according to the memo, Kodali only did a cursory history, and failed to get details including the nature of the pain, its severity, the frequency of the episodes and the duration.
Although Kodali performed electrocardiogram testing in his office, he did not order any further testing and diagnosed Cowher as likely suffering panic attacks, even though he did not have a history of anxiety or depression, and instead had a family history of coronary artery disease, the memo said.
According to the plaintiff's memo, "there can be no question" that, when Cowher presented to Kodali, what he was in fact suffering from was unstable angina.
On Aug. 23, 2016—40 days after his visit with Kodali—Cowher collapsed while jogging and died. The memo said an autopsy revealed severe cardiovascular disease with 80% to 90% obstructions of his coronary and anterior descending arteries, and moderate obstructions of several other arteries.
The memo said Cowher worked for the Department of Corrections, and, along with his wife, was survived by his 21-year-old daughter.
According to the memo, the plaintiff's expert cardiologist, Dr. Emil Hayek, opined that by relying on the months-old stress test, Kodali did not meet the standard of care and he should have performed additional testing. The plaintiff's expert economist, David Hopkins, also opined Cowher's lost earning ranged between $1 million to $2.7 million.
The defendants noted that the prior stress test showed Cowher had excellent functional capacity, that labs studied done two days before his visit with Kodali were negative for heart damage and that Cowher reported he was able to exercise without having any symptoms.
Youman, however, said the defenses' medical expert admitted Kodali made a false assumption that Cowher's symptoms from the 2016 visit were the same as those from the 2015 visit. He also said the defendants continued to dispute the cause of death, despite the autopsy findings, which, he said was an argument that did not play well before the jury.
"The arguments were just not supportable," Youman said.
According to Youman, the verdict was handed up after an hour of deliberations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSuperior Court Rejects Pa. Hospital's Challenge to $7.3M Med Mal Judgment
3 minute readLongtime Reed Smith Health Care Partner Opts for Solo Practice Over Retirement
3 minute readPa. Appeals Court: Trial Judge Dismissed Med Mal Claims Without Giving Plaintiffs Proper Time to Fight Back
4 minute readPa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250