Lancaster President Judge Gets 'Letter of Counsel' for Allegedly Invoking His Office During Traffic Stop
The JCB made public Monday afternoon that it had sent Lancaster County President Judge Dennis Reinaker a letter of counsel earlier this month, after finding that he violated a provision of the Judicial Code of Conduct barring judges from "impropriety and the appearance of impropriety."
December 31, 2019 at 01:13 PM
4 minute read
The Judicial Conduct Board has decided not to bring formal disciplinary charges against Lancaster County's president judge after he appeared to invoke his judicial office during a tense traffic stop earlier this year. The disciplinary body has instead sent the judge a "letter of counsel," which is an informal measure that can be used against the judge if any future disciplinary issues arise.
The JCB made public Monday afternoon that it had sent Lancaster County President Judge Dennis Reinaker a letter of counsel earlier this month, after finding that he violated a provision of the Judicial Code of Conduct barring judges from "impropriety and the appearance of impropriety." Along with making the letter public, the announcement said the board felt the letter was merited because the president judge had self-reporter the incident, the incident was an isolated event, and Reinaker was cooperative with the investigation.
READ THE LETTER:
|The disciplinary action stems from an incident in the spring that attracted significant media attention after Lancaster Online obtained a video of the traffic stop in June.
According to the letter, which was signed by JCB chief counsel Richard Long, Reinaker was pulled over for a traffic stop April 26 along Pitney Road in Lancaster. The JCB said that, soon after pulling his vehicle over, Reinaker stepped out and asked the police officer, "What do you think you're doing pulling me over? For blowing my horn?"
The officer told him to get back into his car, but before he did, the judge said "You better check the registration on this plate soon, mister."
Soon after, the officer released Rainaker from the stop, saying "Have a good day, judge," the JCB said.
According to the letter, Reinaker self-reported the conduct June 14, which was two days before Lancaster Online posted the video. The JCB also noted that Reinaker denied that he was abusing the prestige of the judicial office, but argued that he was irritated at being stopped for, what he believed to be, no reason . The JCB also noted that Reinaker admitted the behavior was inappropriate and that it could create the appearance of impropriety.
Ultimately, the JCB determined the conduct violated Canon 1, Rule 1.2 of the Code of Judicial Conduct, which says judges must "act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety."
The letter, however, said that, while the board found enough evidence to press disciplinary charges, the mitigating circumstances of Reinaker having self-reported the incident, his cooperation with the investigation, the fact that the incident was brief and only occurred the one time, Reinaker's apology to the office and his decision to accept responsibility for the conduct, warranted the lesser discipline.
The letter of counsel was sent to the president judge Dec. 13, and Reinaker signed it more than two weeks later on Dec. 30.
Less formal "letters of counsel" are not always made public, but the JCB's announcement said that disposing of Reinaker's case with the informal measure was contingent on the president judge agreeing to make the letter public.
Philadelphia disciplinary attorney Ellen Brotman, who is not involved in the case, said that, if the conduct from April marked the first time Reinaker has been disciplined or the subject of a complaint, a letter of counsel seems to be the appropriate disciplinary measure. The fact that Reinaker self-reported, she said, likely went a long way towards the board agreeing to the less formal means.
"There's a public embarrassment aspect of the discipline and also a public acknowledgement that even what one would consider a minimal abuse of judicial power is not acceptable," Brotman said.
A review of publicly available disciplinary records on the JCB's list of cases instituted since 2014 did not show any instances where the JCB resolved a case by sending a "letter of counsel;" however, in 2017, the JCB announced that it sent a similar letter to Centre County Judge Jonathan Grine, after finding that he ran afoul of judicial conduct provisions through his personal relationship with the county district attorney. That announcement similar noted that Grine had cooperated with the investigation and had apologized for his conduct.
Reinaker's attorney Christopher A. Ferro of York did not return a message seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpecial Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250