Jury Awards Pedestrian $1M in Monroe County Accident Suit
A Monroe County jury has awarded $1 million to a man who was struck by a speeding vehicle in a parking lot.
January 02, 2020 at 03:14 PM
3 minute read
Kanyuck v. Progressive
$1M Verdict
Date of Verdict: Dec. 10.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Monroe.
Judge: David Williamson.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Multiple leg fractures and contusions.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Thomas Foley III, Foley Law Firm, Scranton.
Defense Counsel: G. Christopher Parrish of Forry Ullman, Bethlehem.
Defense Expert: John Dieckman, vocational, Malvern.
Comment:
A Monroe County jury has awarded $1 million to a man who was struck by a speeding vehicle in a parking lot.
The verdict was reached in Kanyuck v. Progressive. Progressive Northern Insurance Co. will pay $1 million to the plaintiff Stanley Kanyuck, who settled with the driver, Agnes Hamilton, prior to the trial, according to the firm representing the plaintiffs.
Hamilton, who has since moved to Scotland, had a policy with Liberty Mutual for $250,000 to $500,000 in coverage. Progressive is the automobile insurer for Kanyuck.
According to the plaintiffs' pretrial memorandum, on April 4, 2017, Hamilton, then 80, was speeding in her Nissan Rogue SUV through the parking lot of Ahart's Market where Stanley Kanyuck, then 43, and his father, Stephen Kanyuck, then 72, were walking. Hamilton allegedly hit the accelerator instead of the brake, crashing into a shopping cart corral and other vehicles, pinning the pair.
Stephen Kanyuck's injuries included multiple leg fractures and contusions. He settled for $500,000 at the outset of trial, according to his attorney.
Stanley Kanyuck also suffered multiple fractures as well as leg and ankle injuries, according to court papers. Stanley Kanyuck, formerly a security guard until the accident, is permanently disabled and forced to walk with a cane, the plaintiffs' court papers said. He requested approximately $702,000 in future lost income.
Progressive argued that Stanley Kanyuck's lost wage claims were inflated because he could perform nonstrenuous labor.
The defendant also noted vocational expert witness John Dieckman's assessment that Stanley Kanyuck's associate's degree in computers and his understanding of technology were factors in favor of gaining new employment.
"It was also noted that Mr. Kanyuck has experience with Microsoft Office and acknowledged no deficits with regards to aptitudes of reading and writing in[sic] math," the defendant's papers said. "Mr. Dieckman opined that Mr. Kanyunck clearly has an aptitude for computers and electronic communications which would suggest he has the ability to work in a wide range of sedentary positions."
Scranton-based Thomas Foley III represents the Kanyucks.
In an email, Foley said, "Progressive's offer was $100,000 of $325,000 in coverage. The verdict was $1,050,000. The case was tried by both Thomas J. Foley III and Michael J. Foley. Additionally, Kevin P. Foley secured a verdict of $800,000 on November 13, 2019 also in Monroe County against State Farm. The offer was $40,000 on $100,000 policy."
G. Christopher Parrish of Forry Ullman represents Progressive and did not respond to a request for comment.
—P.J. D'Annunzio, of the Law Weekly
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readSupreme Court's Ruling in 'Students for Fair Admissions' and Its Impact on DEI Initiatives in the Workplace
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Pusillanimous Press
- 2Contract Lifecycle Management Company ContractPodAi Unveils Leah Drive
- 3'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 4Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 5Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250