The U.S. Supreme Court is considering whether a state can copyright annotated compilations of its own statutes. In December, the court heard oral argument in Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, a case that may provide clarity on what sort of material constitutes a “government edict” that falls outside the scope of the copyright laws.
The official code of Georgia annotated (OCGA) is more than just a collection of Georgia statutes. It is accompanied by related annotations consisting of cross references, commentaries, excerpts from law review articles, summaries of opinions by the Georgia attorney general, as well as other research references. Georgia contracts with Mathew Bender & Co., a division of LexisNexis, to prepare the annotations, and Georgia retains the copyright to the OCGA. The Code Revision Commission, a body established by the Georgia legislature composed of members of the legislature, public officials and other appointed individuals, supervises the creation of the OCGA and offers final approval. The OCGA states that the annotations are part of the official code and that the statutory portions are “to be merged with annotations”; however, a Georgia statute clarifies that the annotations do not have the force of law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]