Ex-Cop Who Was on DA's 'Do Not Call List' Sues Meek Mill, Amazon Over Documentary
Ex-police officer Sequeta Williams has filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, alleging she was defamed in an episode of "Free Meek," a documentary series that was made available on Amazon Prime last year.
January 09, 2020 at 02:30 PM
3 minute read
A former Philadelphia police officer has sued Amazon, Roc Nation, Meek Mill and others, claiming she was defamed in a documentary that premiered last year about the rapper's high-profile clashes with the city's legal system.
Ex-police officer Sequeta Williams has filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, alleging she was defamed in an episode of "Free Meek," a documentary series that was made available on Amazon Prime last year. The suit, which seeks in excess of $75,000, lists Roc Nation, Jay-Z, Wenner Media and Robert Rihmeek Williams, also known as Meek Mill, as defendants.
According to the 33-page complaint, which Philadelphia attorney Steven Marino of Marino & Associates filed Tuesday, the problematic area in the documentary occurred when a photograph of Sequeta Williams appeared as Defender Association of Philadelphia attorney Bradley Bridge and a journalist from Rolling Stone spoke about a list of allegedly problematic police officers that the Philadelphia District Attorney's office maintains. That so-called "Do Not Call" list includes the names of officers that prosecutors do not use as witnesses because their testimony is believed to be unreliable.
READ THE COMPLAINT:
|Although Williams is included on the DA's so-called "Do Not Call" list, the plaintiff argued that she is not on the list because of any history of dishonesty, but rather for criminal charges that arose after four people tried to mug her and her significant other while she was off duty.
"The communication presented in Season 1, Episode 4 of the documentary series 'Free Meek' entitled Filthadelphia falsely imputes a message to the minds of the average persons among whom it is intended to circulate that plaintiff Sequeta Williams was a dirty and dishonest police officer," Williams said in the complaint.
Williams in the complaint asserts she was not placed on the list because of unreliable testimony. Rather, she said, it stemmed from charges of simple assault and other offenses as a result of an off-duty incident where she allegedly pulled a firearm in an effort to deescalate a mugging attempt. She was acquitted on all charges in that case, according to the complaint.
Neither Bridge, who has been handling appeals involving allegedly corrupt police officers since 1995, nor Rolling Stone journalist Paul Solotaroff were named as defendants in the complaint, and, according to the documentary, they did not mention Williams' name, but had been only discussing the nature of the "Do Not Call" list when the graphic of Williams appeared.
Williams' suit is the latest in a long-running legal saga that has developed around Mill's case, and the documentary.
Mill's criminal case and closely watched spat with Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Genece Brinkley over the lengthy criminal sentence she imposed for probation violations caught national attention and stirred controversy in the local legal community. Then, even before the documentary aired, Brinkley's attorney, A. Charles Peruto, sued the movie makers, alleging they violated the Wiretap Act by using off-the-record comments he made. That suit was dismissed in June.
Marino did not return a message seeking comment. No attorneys had entered an appearance for the defendants as of Thursday morning. Roc Nation, Wenner Media and Amazon each did not return a message seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEx-DLA Piper, Ballard Spahr Atty Accused of Aiding Video Game Company Founder's Misappropriation Scheme
5 minute readFrom M&A to Music Fest, Ballard Spahr Attorney Hosts Week-Long Jam Session With Help of Clients
5 minute read$43.5M Med Mal Verdict for Ex-Eagles Team Captain Withstands Appellate Challenge
Pa. Casinos Ask Court to Force State to Tax Skill Games Found in Stores Equally to Slots
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250