Parents of Teacher Stabbed to Death Can Pursue Lawsuit Over Medical Examiner's Suicide Ruling
A Philadelphia judge has ruled that the family of Ellen Greenberg, a teacher who was found dead with 20 stab wounds, can move forward with a lawsuit against the city Medical Examiner's Office to remove from the record suicide as her official cause of death.
January 09, 2020 at 02:30 PM
3 minute read
A Philadelphia judge has ruled that the family of Ellen Greenberg, a teacher who was found dead with 20 stab wounds, can move forward with a lawsuit against the city Medical Examiner's Office to remove from the record suicide as her official cause of death.
Greenberg's body was discovered by her fiance in their Manayunk apartment in 2011. She was 27 years old. The coroner originally listed her cause of death as a homicide, but subsequently switched it to suicide without explanation.
Her parents, Joshua and Sandra Greenberg, who independently investigated their daughter's death over the course of years, disputed the ruling and sued the city to have it changed to "could not be determined." The controversy surrounding Ellen Greenberg's cause of death was first reported by The Philadelphia Inquirer in March.
The city objected to the family's lawsuit, but a Philadelphia judge overruled those objections Jan. 7, paving the way for the case to continue.
"In a precedent-setting decision, we are grateful that Judge Paula Patrick ruled that both of our claims in equity may proceed and that Ellen finally may have justice and her day in court," said the family's lawyer, Joseph Podraza of Lamb McErlane. "It has taken nearly nine years for this to happen, but we believe justice for Ellen is finally within our grasps."
The city declined to comment on the ruling.
The family's complaint said that Greenberg had multiple stab wounds of varying depth on the back of her neck as well as her chest and back.
"The medical evidence indicates that not all of these wounds could have possibly been self-inflicted," the complaint said. "Moreover, this evidence strongly establishes a knife other than the one recovered at the scene was used to inflict many of Ellen's 20 separate stab wounds. Other information, some just recently obtained, firmly draws into doubt—if not forcefully rebuts—a finding of suicide."
It continued, "Unsurprisingly, after thorough autopsy and toxicology examinations, defendants initially ruled Ellen Greenberg's death was a homicide. Later, and only after the Philadelphia Police Department had begun to publicly contradict the defendants' medical findings, the defendants inexplicably changed the manner of her death from homicide to suicide without explanation, and without any compelling reasons or sufficient medical support for this reversal."
The city argued in its preliminary objections that medical examiner Marlon Osbourne had the discretion to determine the cause of Greenberg's death.
"There is no requirement that the medical examiner convince members of the public of the accuracy of their findings," the city's court papers said. "There is no requirement that the medical examiner accept or revise his conclusion as a result of reviewing the opinions of other forensic professionals."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHigh Court Revives Kleinbard's Bid to Collect $70K in Legal Fees From Lancaster DA
4 minute readJudges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute readDispute Over Failure to Accommodate Disability Ends in $900K Settlement
3 minute readPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250