Parents of Teacher Stabbed to Death Can Pursue Lawsuit Over Medical Examiner's Suicide Ruling
A Philadelphia judge has ruled that the family of Ellen Greenberg, a teacher who was found dead with 20 stab wounds, can move forward with a lawsuit against the city Medical Examiner's Office to remove from the record suicide as her official cause of death.
January 09, 2020 at 02:30 PM
3 minute read
A Philadelphia judge has ruled that the family of Ellen Greenberg, a teacher who was found dead with 20 stab wounds, can move forward with a lawsuit against the city Medical Examiner's Office to remove from the record suicide as her official cause of death.
Greenberg's body was discovered by her fiance in their Manayunk apartment in 2011. She was 27 years old. The coroner originally listed her cause of death as a homicide, but subsequently switched it to suicide without explanation.
Her parents, Joshua and Sandra Greenberg, who independently investigated their daughter's death over the course of years, disputed the ruling and sued the city to have it changed to "could not be determined." The controversy surrounding Ellen Greenberg's cause of death was first reported by The Philadelphia Inquirer in March.
The city objected to the family's lawsuit, but a Philadelphia judge overruled those objections Jan. 7, paving the way for the case to continue.
"In a precedent-setting decision, we are grateful that Judge Paula Patrick ruled that both of our claims in equity may proceed and that Ellen finally may have justice and her day in court," said the family's lawyer, Joseph Podraza of Lamb McErlane. "It has taken nearly nine years for this to happen, but we believe justice for Ellen is finally within our grasps."
The city declined to comment on the ruling.
The family's complaint said that Greenberg had multiple stab wounds of varying depth on the back of her neck as well as her chest and back.
"The medical evidence indicates that not all of these wounds could have possibly been self-inflicted," the complaint said. "Moreover, this evidence strongly establishes a knife other than the one recovered at the scene was used to inflict many of Ellen's 20 separate stab wounds. Other information, some just recently obtained, firmly draws into doubt—if not forcefully rebuts—a finding of suicide."
It continued, "Unsurprisingly, after thorough autopsy and toxicology examinations, defendants initially ruled Ellen Greenberg's death was a homicide. Later, and only after the Philadelphia Police Department had begun to publicly contradict the defendants' medical findings, the defendants inexplicably changed the manner of her death from homicide to suicide without explanation, and without any compelling reasons or sufficient medical support for this reversal."
The city argued in its preliminary objections that medical examiner Marlon Osbourne had the discretion to determine the cause of Greenberg's death.
"There is no requirement that the medical examiner convince members of the public of the accuracy of their findings," the city's court papers said. "There is no requirement that the medical examiner accept or revise his conclusion as a result of reviewing the opinions of other forensic professionals."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHigh Court Revives Kleinbard's Bid to Collect $70K in Legal Fees From Lancaster DA
4 minute readJudges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute readDispute Over Failure to Accommodate Disability Ends in $900K Settlement
3 minute readPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250