Pepper Hamilton, Troutman Sanders Make Merger Official
With more than 1,000 lawyers, Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders is poised to become one of the country's 50 highest-grossing law firms after the merger takes effect in April.
January 09, 2020 at 10:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Pepper Hamilton and Troutman Sanders have officially agreed to merge, the firms announced Thursday, creating a new 1,100-lawyer giant with offices in 23 locations. The combination will take effect April 1.
The American Lawyer reported in November that the two firms had been in merger talks for months. Partners at both Troutman and Pepper voted to approve the deal Wednesday.
The combined firm will be named Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders.
"We want to make sure our clients recognize the name and continue to see the goodwill these names have established over the years," Troutman Sanders managing partner Steve Lewis said in an interview. "We also recognize that in today's world, law firms will have a street name too. For us, we thought it made great sense for that to be Troutman Pepper."
Lewis will be chair and CEO of the combined firm. Tom Gallagher, chair of the executive committee at Philadelphia-based Pepper Hamilton, will be the new firm's vice chair.
Tom Cole, managing partner of Pepper Hamilton, will be managing partner of Troutman Pepper. And Andrea Farley, who chairs Troutman Sanders' partner compensation committee, will hold that same role at Troutman Pepper.
Lewis noted that both firms underwent leadership transitions not long ago to prepare for the next generation. "I think it was the natural evolution that those in place would stay involved in the same or different capacities," he said.
The two firms got serious about pursuing a merger over the summer, Gallagher and Lewis both said.
Noting that "lawyers are generally skeptical to begin with," Lewis said, leadership from both firms went in expecting a merger was unlikely to work out. "But at every meeting we got the exact opposite feel," he said.
He also noted that Atlanta-born Troutman Sanders has completed several other significant combinations. It merged with 150-lawyer Virginia-based Mays & Valentine in 2001, brought on the 90-lawyer New York office of now-defunct Jenkens & Gilchrist in 2005, and combined with 100-lawyer D.C. boutique Ross, Dixon & Bell in 2009.
Lewis said that in each of those combinations, Troutman Sanders gained a strong foothold in a key market. That's "a great thing for a firm," he said, and he expects the same will happen with the latest merger, which is also much larger in scope than the previous three.
Troutman, which was No. 68 on the 2019 Am Law 100 with revenue of $521.5 million, has about 650 lawyers in 12 U.S. offices. Pepper Hamilton, which was No. 105 on the 2019 Am Law 200, has about 450 lawyers in 14 offices and reported gross revenue of $334 million last year.
Together, the two firms project they'll generate gross revenue of more than $900 million post-merger, earning a ranking in the top 50 of the Am Law 100. Gallagher said that is based on their 2019 performance.
Both firms have large offices in New York and Washington, D.C., and they both have an office in Orange County. Their other locations do not overlap. While Pepper Hamilton brings to the table an established presence in the Philadelphia region, the Northeast and Detroit, Troutman Sanders has longtime roots in the Southeast that Pepper was previously lacking, as well as Chicago and Portland, Oregon.
The firms have some practice overlap and clients in common. One major client they share is Johnson & Johnson, Gallagher said. Both firms' leaders said their rates and compensation structures were similar.
Asked about each firm's practice strengths, they noted Pepper's health science and private equity practices, and Troutman's energy, real estate, financial services and insurance practices.
|Courting Mergers
The last time Pepper Hamilton was engaged in merger talks that became public, the discussions were with Pittsburgh-born international firm Reed Smith. Gallagher said Pepper Hamilton has "had fairly preliminary conversations with plenty of firms, including Reed Smith, over many, many years."
After the talks with Reed Smith broke off, Pepper reported steep declines in gross revenue and profits per equity partner for 2016. Since then, the firm has been working to improve its financial performance with a "laser-focus" on improving revenue per lawyer, Gallagher and Cole said.
"It's ended up with increasing our RPL every year for the past couple years. We finished this [past] year with what will be the highest RPL in the firm's history," Gallagher said.
Troutman has also been considering mergers with other large U.S. firms. Last year it entertained merger discussions with Dallas-based Winstead, but those talks broke off in July 2018 due to obstacles such as law firm billing rates and preferred client mix, according to Texas Lawyer.
Pepper Hamilton is the second Philadelphia-based Am Law 200 firm to announce a major merger planned for 2020. Drinker Biddle & Reath announced in December that it will be merging with Midwest-based Faegre Baker Daniels in February.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpecial Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
2 minute readPa. Firms Set to Finish Year Strong, Thanks to Demand Uptick, Shorter Collections Cycle
4 minute readImmunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 2Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 3Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 4Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
- 5Bolstering Southern California Presence, Sidley Austin Settles Into Revitalized Downtown LA Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250