Pa. Joins 21 Other States in Settlement With PayPal Charitable Giving Fund Over Disclosures
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong helped lead a multistate settlement with PayPal Charitable Giving Fund. The settlement, announced Tuesday, ensures donors have adequate information and disclosures when making charitable contributions through the company's online fundraising platform.
January 14, 2020 at 03:28 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Connecticut Law Tribune
A multistate settlement with PayPal Charitable Giving Fund includes a $200,000 donation to the National Association of Attorneys General, and an assurance the nonprofit will provide adequate disclosures to help donors make informed decisions.
Pennsylvania, New York, Texas and the District of Columbia were among 22 signatories to enter the assurance of voluntary compliance, according to information released Tuesday. The agreement ended a national investigation—that Connecticut and Nebraska have co-led since 2017—into the nonprofit arm of California-based electronic money transfer company PayPal Inc.
To address the concerns of several attorneys general about PayPal's fundraising endeavors, including how it treated charitable contributions, the nonprofit agreed to reform its disclosures. It will clarify, for example, the time frame in which a selected charity may receive funds from PayPal Charitable Giving Fund. It also agreed to notify donors when it redirects their contributions to organizations other that the ones they selected.
PayPal Charitable Giving will also not use language implying that potential donors are directly making a donation to their chosen charity, according to the 22-page agreement. Several states launched an investigation into PayPal's fundraising activities in 2017.
No one from PayPal's corporate media relations department in San Jose, California, responded to a request for comment Tuesday.
Meanwhile, Connecticut Attorney General William Tong applauded the resolution.
"When donors make contributions online, they deserve to know exactly where their money is going," Tong wrote in a statement. "PayPal's Charitable Giving Fund wasn't doing that, and that's why attorneys general across the country joined together to ensure donor wishes are respected and protected moving forward."
Tong said the settlement sends a message that "attorneys general nationwide are prepared to act together to ensure honest and transparent treatment of charitable contributions, to protect donors and the organizations they seek to support."
Connecticut's Consumer Protection Commissioner Michelle Seagull agreed.
"Consumers have a right to know exactly where their money is going when they donate to charity," Seagull said in a statement. "We always encourage consumers to do their research before they donate so that they can make an informed decision, and if there may be changes to that decision, they should be disclosed."
Signatories include Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, the North Carolina secretary of state, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas and Wisconsin.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHigh Court Revives Kleinbard's Bid to Collect $70K in Legal Fees From Lancaster DA
4 minute readJudges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute readDispute Over Failure to Accommodate Disability Ends in $900K Settlement
3 minute readPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250