OAG Brings Criminal Charges Against Company, Owner for Wage Violations
Employers in Pennsylvania should stay on their toes as the Pennsylvania attorney general (AG) announced charges against a major mechanical contractor engaged in numerous public works projects for crimes arising from a prevailing wage dispute.
January 14, 2020 at 12:50 PM
4 minute read
Employers in Pennsylvania should stay on their toes as the Pennsylvania attorney general (AG) announced charges against a major mechanical contractor engaged in numerous public works projects for crimes arising from a prevailing wage dispute. This marks the first time that the attorney general has brought criminal charges for prevailing wage violations, which was previously enforced only through civil actions.
In September 2019, after a 21-month grand jury investigation, Attorney General Josh Shapiro brought charges against Goodco Mechanical, and its owner, Scott Good, arising from violations of the commonwealth's prevailing wage laws by underpaying their employees and claiming credits for benefits not given. The violations occurred in connection with Goodco's participation in the construction of a new Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) district headquarters in Clearfield County. According to the attorney general's criminal complaint, the charges came after the grand jury found that Goodco and Good had "engaged in a misclassification scheme, whereby journeymen electricians and plumbers were directed to record a portion of the hours they worked each workday as lower-paid laborers, in order to reduce labor costs." The AG alleges that "this misrepresentation of the proper wage classification allowed Good and Goodco to bid projects with lower wage and fringe benefit costs."
The grand jury investigation also found that Goodco's scheme was not limited to the PennDOT project. On the contrary, the criminal complaint states that the grand jury found that "the same scheme was used by Good and Goodco on all prevailing wage projects dating back to at least 2010." The attorney general affirms that Goodco's employees initially were fearful of reporting the company's wage violations because they believed that they would be fired or face other workplace retaliation from Good, but that upon completion of the PennDOT project, several workers reported that Goodco had wrongly withheld compensation and benefits from them.
Although the new crime called "prevailing wage theft" has not been created in Pennsylvania, the attorney general charges that Good and Goodco violated existing criminal statutes prohibiting deceptive or fraudulent business practices, theft by unlawful taking, theft by deception and other related crimes. While the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) historically has enforced prevailing wage laws through civil action, the charges against Goodco mark the first time that the OAG has sought to enforce them with criminal penalties. Cases of this nature are being prioritized by the OAG's recently formed fair labor section. When Shapiro ran for AG in 2016, he pledged to create a unit that would "enforce Pennsylvania's labor laws in partnership with the Department of Labor & Industry and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission," among other pro-worker actions. Accordingly, the fair labor section has made a mission of fighting wage theft, tip stealing, worker misclassification and workplace discrimination.
This newly stringent enforcement should serve as a warning to any Pennsylvania employer who is not careful with its wage-payment policy. Not only has Goodco been charged with numerous crimes following the 21-month grand jury investigation, but its owner has also been charged with perjury, tampering with public records and false swearing—all of which are felonies that can carry significant penalties. As Pennsylvania has turned to criminal prosecution against employers who violate wage laws (rather than the more typical civil cases), business owners are obliged to treat prevailing wage disputes with greater seriousness. Even unintentional errors in wage payments may result in criminal charges that can bring on grave consequences for businesses and their owners alike.
It is a vital time for Pennsylvania businesses to undertake a meticulous review of their payment practices in consultation with their attorneys, to eliminate the unnecessary risk of prosecution by ensuring ongoing compliance with labor and wage laws.
Christopher D. Carusone and Steven M. Williams are partners in the Harrisburg office of Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman and members of its consumer protection defense group. Before joining the firm, Carusone served as chief deputy attorney general in the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General. Carl Engel is an associate in the commercial litigation group in the firm's Philadelphia office.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readSupreme Court's Ruling in 'Students for Fair Admissions' and Its Impact on DEI Initiatives in the Workplace
6 minute readMembership Has Its Privileges: Bankruptcy Court Examines LLC's Authority to File Bankruptcy
8 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250