OAG Brings Criminal Charges Against Company, Owner for Wage Violations
Employers in Pennsylvania should stay on their toes as the Pennsylvania attorney general (AG) announced charges against a major mechanical contractor engaged in numerous public works projects for crimes arising from a prevailing wage dispute.
January 14, 2020 at 12:50 PM
4 minute read
Employers in Pennsylvania should stay on their toes as the Pennsylvania attorney general (AG) announced charges against a major mechanical contractor engaged in numerous public works projects for crimes arising from a prevailing wage dispute. This marks the first time that the attorney general has brought criminal charges for prevailing wage violations, which was previously enforced only through civil actions.
In September 2019, after a 21-month grand jury investigation, Attorney General Josh Shapiro brought charges against Goodco Mechanical, and its owner, Scott Good, arising from violations of the commonwealth's prevailing wage laws by underpaying their employees and claiming credits for benefits not given. The violations occurred in connection with Goodco's participation in the construction of a new Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) district headquarters in Clearfield County. According to the attorney general's criminal complaint, the charges came after the grand jury found that Goodco and Good had "engaged in a misclassification scheme, whereby journeymen electricians and plumbers were directed to record a portion of the hours they worked each workday as lower-paid laborers, in order to reduce labor costs." The AG alleges that "this misrepresentation of the proper wage classification allowed Good and Goodco to bid projects with lower wage and fringe benefit costs."
The grand jury investigation also found that Goodco's scheme was not limited to the PennDOT project. On the contrary, the criminal complaint states that the grand jury found that "the same scheme was used by Good and Goodco on all prevailing wage projects dating back to at least 2010." The attorney general affirms that Goodco's employees initially were fearful of reporting the company's wage violations because they believed that they would be fired or face other workplace retaliation from Good, but that upon completion of the PennDOT project, several workers reported that Goodco had wrongly withheld compensation and benefits from them.
Although the new crime called "prevailing wage theft" has not been created in Pennsylvania, the attorney general charges that Good and Goodco violated existing criminal statutes prohibiting deceptive or fraudulent business practices, theft by unlawful taking, theft by deception and other related crimes. While the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) historically has enforced prevailing wage laws through civil action, the charges against Goodco mark the first time that the OAG has sought to enforce them with criminal penalties. Cases of this nature are being prioritized by the OAG's recently formed fair labor section. When Shapiro ran for AG in 2016, he pledged to create a unit that would "enforce Pennsylvania's labor laws in partnership with the Department of Labor & Industry and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission," among other pro-worker actions. Accordingly, the fair labor section has made a mission of fighting wage theft, tip stealing, worker misclassification and workplace discrimination.
This newly stringent enforcement should serve as a warning to any Pennsylvania employer who is not careful with its wage-payment policy. Not only has Goodco been charged with numerous crimes following the 21-month grand jury investigation, but its owner has also been charged with perjury, tampering with public records and false swearing—all of which are felonies that can carry significant penalties. As Pennsylvania has turned to criminal prosecution against employers who violate wage laws (rather than the more typical civil cases), business owners are obliged to treat prevailing wage disputes with greater seriousness. Even unintentional errors in wage payments may result in criminal charges that can bring on grave consequences for businesses and their owners alike.
It is a vital time for Pennsylvania businesses to undertake a meticulous review of their payment practices in consultation with their attorneys, to eliminate the unnecessary risk of prosecution by ensuring ongoing compliance with labor and wage laws.
Christopher D. Carusone and Steven M. Williams are partners in the Harrisburg office of Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman and members of its consumer protection defense group. Before joining the firm, Carusone served as chief deputy attorney general in the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General. Carl Engel is an associate in the commercial litigation group in the firm's Philadelphia office.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 2CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 3Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 4Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
- 5The Week in Data Jan. 21: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250